Podboq, What is the problem. Did you do a web search for bodacious something and get turned on by POPSCI? Sorry, couldn't resist.
That's a great looking car. NJDEVIL is right; they would be great in big cities. True, some people in big cities have to park on the street. However, most people live in the suburbs and commute (less than 100 miles round trip). Heck you could even equip parking garages with plugs if needed. The "Big 3" auto companies in America have a problem. They have become too large, and they can’t get anything accomplished quickly. Labor unions are also a part of the problem. They have become so entwined in the decision making of the company that they cannot operate efficiently. They can get great looking to car shows, but they never come to fruition. They have become such large bureaucracies that nothing can get done. I think the best possible way to fix the problem is to break each company into about 4 or 5 smaller companies. The cream will rise to the top.
After several centuries of casting and counting ballots, it’s shocking that we still haven’t mastered what seems to be a simple task. But anyone who lived through the 2000 presidential election, in which a mishmash of flawed voting machines, contradictory county procedures, and unclear state laws in Florida led to the least reliable outcome in history, knows that 21st century voting is no better than the era when we shouted out our votes at the courthouse steps.
You're saying that providing a receipt for someone could be detrimental, because it could be used as proof to a 3rd party that you voted for someone specific. I understand your point. Someone might put a gun to your head and say, "Vote for _______, or I'm going to kill you”, and the same goes for bribery. That is a good point. Maybe this would be a better solution. Vote on an electronic machine, print a single receipt for the voter (so they can verify that the machine processed the vote correctly). Then require that the receipt be deposited in a ballet box for redundancy. The person would have that “warm and fuzzy”, and you would have a viable back up in case of machine failure or recount. I would still bar-code the receipt somehow for easy scanning in the event they had to be used.
After several centuries of casting and counting ballots, it’s shocking that we still haven’t mastered what seems to be a simple task. But anyone who lived through the 2000 presidential election, in which a mishmash of flawed voting machines, contradictory county procedures, and unclear state laws in Florida led to the least reliable outcome in history, knows that 21st century voting is no better than the era when we shouted out our votes at the courthouse steps.
I've heard of voting machines that don't even print a receipt of who you voted for. Who thought up this design? I'm all for a paperless society, but some things scream for redundancy! A simple receipt for the voter and one for the registrar seems like it would be a major requirement. Barcode them, and in the event of a recount you could simply scan them. It might not solve tamper problems or paper jams, but it would provide peace of mind. If people working cash registers can switch out a paper roll, it can’t be rocket science. I’m all for advancing the way we vote. Whether it be voter cards that are issued with a chip in them, secure web sites, or whatever… Let’s just use some common sense. Please!
Embryonic stem cells, which can be coaxed to turn into any kind of cell type, have been hailed as a 21st-century panacea. But they are fraught with ethical problems because they come from embryos. Last November, two teams of scientists turned ordinary adult skin cells into pluripotent stem cells—capable of becoming any kind of tissue—a feat that could solve the ethical problem forever. Here’s how one group did it.
I can only say, "Bravo"! Keep up your fantastic work!
Making processors for mobile gadgets is mostly an afterthought. Hone a chip from a desktop PC, tweak it to suck less power and vent less heat, and stick it in a laptop. Not so with Intel’s Atom. It’s Intel’s smallest-ever microprocessor, a 24-square-millimeter chip crammed with 47 million data-carrying transistors, and it’s paving the way for the next era of affordable, power-saving gadgets.
The Atom is small… you can't argue that! However, Tom's Hardware (www.tomshardware.com) recently compared the Intel Atom to AMD's old Athlon 64. This is what they had to say, "Conclusion: Athlon 64 Is More Economical, Faster, And Quieter". Intel does a great job of advertising their products (even the ones that really are not any great break through). They did pick a catchy name though. VIA also has the NANO chip that beats the Atom in many benchmarks, but I think it uses a few more watts. Once AMD is able to shrink their die, maybe they'll launch a smaller version of the Athlon.... Oh oh, they could call it the electron! AMD, remember you saw that name here first. Call me :)
The board that has been tasked with reviewing NASA's plans to build a craft that will return astronauts to the Moon apparently has too many insiders.
It's too bad our government doesn't have a better watchdog organization to ensure those who hold the highest offices in our country don't have "Conflicts of Interest". Bravo NASA IG, BRAVO! We don't need another self-licking ice cream cone.
It could be an aerial photo of an oil spill: liquid spheres pooling, oozing, dwarfing a bedraggled landscape. I half expect to zoom in on poisoned seal pups or waterbirds dragging their oil-soaked feathers. But the scene is microscopic. The landscape is made of E. coli. And whats happening is exactly the opposite of what it seems. The little bugs arent drowning in fuel. Theyre making it.
If you've seen the movie Legend, you know where I'm going. I think the idea of using microbes to work for us is great. It would actually be a great symbiotic relationship. They get to eat/reproduce, and we get the byproduct (fuel). However, it goes without saying that the testing must take into careful consideration possible consequences. Such as a “Microbe Locust” that complete destroys everything organic in its path. Especially when you are talking about creating something that is hard to kill, “Making the bugs hardy enough to survive the brutal life of a fuel-manufacturing microbe is key”. While you are "programming" these microbes, be sure to program an easy off switch that doesn't require harsh pesticides. :)
Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing
Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed
Share links with friends, comment on stories and more
In our December issue, Popular Science names the 100 best innovations of the year: bombproof wallpaper, self-parking cars, the fastest helicopter, and 97 more. Plus inventor profiles and videos.
Check out the best of what's new here.