Despite the economic flogging we’re trying our best not to think about, most of us don’t bat an eye when shelling out that monthly 50-plus bucks for Internet access. I guess that’s a testament to how deeply integrated into our lives the Web has become in just the last few years. Between my home Internet service from Time Warner and my data plan from Verizon Wireless, I’m paying about $80 per month to get online. If I travel, I pay T-Mobile et al. another toll to browse in the airport terminal and then I usually end up paying someone else for Internet access once I’m in my hotel room. When all is said and done, I cough up $100 or more per month to get online. I don’t know about you, but that seems like a lot of bread these days.
You are missing an important fact. (One that I can't believe a professor of economics can't figure out.) High speed Internet is just like everything else in electronics / computers. You are getting a lot more for your money. When "broadband" started out, you typically got .5 to 1Mbit per second speeds. 2 years ago, Cox cable was offering 6Mbit for their most expensive home broadband...now they offer 20Mbit for about the same price. Internet access isn't likely to get more expensive anytime soon. We will just keep getting bigger and bigger pipes. (Especially once IPTV takes off.)
Dear EarthTalk: What's the story with animal cloning? Is the meat industry really cloning animals now to "beef up" production? -- Frank DeFazio, Sudbury, MA
Dustin, First of all, allergic reactions are rarely fatal (besides peanut type allergies and bee sting allergies and the like). I am an allergy sufferer and have been all my life, I don't even try to avoid my allergens...I just deal with the symptoms. I'm fairly certain that the hundreds of millions of people in the world who do not have enough food to eat would not care in the least if they might have to suffer through some allergies to keep from dying of starvation. But more importantly, unless you have a reliable source indicating otherwise, the information you posted about Starlink isn't even accurate. According to a CDC report, 28 people reported apparent allergic reactions related to eating corn products that MAY have contained the Starlink protein. However, the US Centers for Disease Control studied the blood of these individuals and concluded there was no evidence that the reactions people experienced were associated with hypersensitivity to the Starlink Bt protein. (I added the capitalization of MAY for emphasis...it's not even certain these people ingested corn with the genetic modification.) Starlink was taken off the market because the FDA had only approved its use in animal feedstocks because there was a concern that it might cause allergic reactions in a small percentage of people. No one even studied if it would, because when the modified protein started showing up in corn for human consumption, it killed the product completely. (The company apparently didn't take enough precautions to prevent cross pollination to other, non-modified corn plants.)
Dear EarthTalk: What's the story with animal cloning? Is the meat industry really cloning animals now to "beef up" production? -- Frank DeFazio, Sudbury, MA
Dustin, While everyone is entitled to their opinion, how about backing up your statement with some reasons? This is, after all, a science web site. Your comment, although perhaps not intended as such, comes across as a knee jerk response not founded on reason. While I agree that cloned animals should be further studied before allowing them to be in our food supply, it seems very unlikely that there will be any scientific basis for keeping them out of our food supply. And saying that "anything genetically altered" should be kept out of our food supply shows a distinct lack of understanding about genetics. Humans have been eating genetically altered animals and plants for thousands of years through 2 processes: cross breeding and selective breeding. Genetic manipulation done through more modern methods achieves the same ends but with more specific "edits" to the genetic code. Are there genetic changes that could negatively affect food quality or safety? I'm sure there are, just as it's possible to cross breed or selectively breed animals or plants and end up with something that is less suitable to commercialization. But that doesn't mean we should not do it. Genetic manipulation offers us an incredible opportunity to work on the problem of world hunger and many other "good things" too.
Ninety years ago the Spanish flu swept across the globe, killing between 50 and 100 million people in only a few months. Since then, the specter of another flu pandemic dealing death and woe around the world has periodically terrified the medical and popular communities. But scientists searching for ways to prevent a similar outbreak in the form of the H5N1 bird flu have found a cure for the deadliest flu in the most unlikely place: nonagenarian immune systems.
@ scubasdsteve87: You would be right if there weren't MILLIONS of dollars per year spent on trying to cure / prevent deaths due to obesity related illness. But there is FAR more money spent on trying to cure illness and disease related to obesity than there is spent on flu research. Not to mention, if a flu pandemic hit that wiped out 10 million or more in a matter of months, we would be begging those flu researchers to save us. It's foolish to think that if "only" 30,000 people a year die of something (just in ONE country) it's not worth studying. For one thing, it's 30,000 people! For another, research into curing or treating one type of infection or illness often illuminates the way to better treatments for other illnesses.
Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing
Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed
Share links with friends, comment on stories and more
In our December issue, Popular Science names the 100 best innovations of the year: bombproof wallpaper, self-parking cars, the fastest helicopter, and 97 more. Plus inventor profiles and videos.
Check out the best of what's new here.