Well, it's never a great idea to stand next to a machine that could create black holes, but the magnets that steer the proton beams around the planet's most powerful particle accelerator would probably spare you from excess radiation. Then again, there is the off chance that some 300 trillion protons could erupt from the device and kill you on the spot.
I trust Professor Rossler's "Seven Reasons for Demanding an LHC Safety Conference". I hope that the Swiss government acts on Dr. Rossler's concerns after he meets with the Swiss president this month (August). I suspect most physicists would have significantly greater levels of concern if they studied the safety issues in detail rather than trust arguments almost exclusively from CERN employee or board physicists with significant vested interests in conveying the perception of safety. I am also concerned that pro-LHC editors including a CERN employee prevent inclusion of peer reviewed papers that question Hawking Radiation as an open question or argue that black holes do not radiate. If micro black holes are created by this collider Earth may be given an incurable case of micro black hole cancer. Going forward based on disputed and unverified safety arguments is reckless beyond comprehension when scientists as credible, eminent and prestigious as Dr. Otto E. Rossler are warning of probable catastrophe if micro black holes are created. JTankers, Subscriber, software developer and founder of LHCFacts.org
The Large Hadron Collider, the giant particle accelerator that's scheduled to begin colliding protons in August, has the potential to produce the long-sought Higgs boson. That elusive particle is a missing link in the commonly accepted model of physics. Observing it would be an important milestone in our understanding of the fundamental forces of the universe.
Awesome video on YouTube "You Prefer Your Collider": youtube.com/watch?v=A1L2xODZSI4 Have you read CERNs SPC Committee's Safety Report disclaimer? "this argument relies on properties of cosmic rays and neutrinos that, while highly plausible, do require confirmation" (indico.cern.ch/getFile.py/access?contribId=20&resId=0&materialId=0&confId=35065) So... Dr. Rosser might still be correct: "...after 50 months the earth to a centimeter would have shrunk" More at LHCFacts.org
Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing
Carry everything you need to make a smart buy on HDTVs, cameras and 14 other product categories right in your pocket
Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed
Share links with friends, comment on stories and more
A field guide to the world's newest and most spectacular unmanned aircraft (supplemented online with a guide to current systems), plus reports from the frontiers of medicine, the definitive word on cellphone radiation and more.
Read the issue here.