• Entertainment & Gaming

    10,000 BC Tramples Box Office and Science

    By Posted on 3.11.2008 2 Comments

    Did anyone really expect 10,000 BC to be scientifically accurate? The reviews of the critically-condemned movie are fun to peruse, but the ones focused on the science are especially entertaining. Because, well, the science (as we all should have guessed) is way, way off.

    3.11.2008 at 12:18pm - Comment by crash37

    I am not disputing the movies quality ( it wasn't great) but as far as factuality is concerned I don't believe they ever intended it to be considered Egyptian. the movie made blatant remarks to suggest that the "gods" in the movie were survivor's of the lost city of atlantis. ( as noted in the movie when the main charter asked where they came from and someone responded " the came from the water when there land's sank into the sea, and when the woman was in the map room and it showed a land mass not now present in the Mediterranean) so i believe there goal, though not well achieved. was to maybe allude to the fact that the survivors of atlantis helped set the pace for civilization around 10,000 BC



Download Our iPhone App

Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing



Follow Us On Twitter

Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed



Become a Fan On Facebook

Share links with friends, comment on stories and more


December 2009: Best of What's New

In our December issue, Popular Science names the 100 best innovations of the year: bombproof wallpaper, self-parking cars, the fastest helicopter, and 97 more. Plus inventor profiles and videos.

Check out the best of what's new here.

Popular Science Photo Pool


Share your photos in the Pop Sci pool at www.flickr.com!
tags_sprite.png
POP_embeddedForm_cover_May09.jpg