Reporting on a test drive of a new car is generally pretty simple. How does the car look? How does it feel? Does it hang with its competitive set? How many parking-garage attendants told you it was awesome? Assessing a pre-prototype version of the Chevy Volt is, um, different. To start, it’s not a production car. Then there’s the context. The Volt lies at the intersection of some of the most contentious issues of the day—electric cars vs. next-generation gas or diesel engines, CAFE standards, greenhouse-gas restrictions, the federal bailout of the American auto industry. Some people still refuse to believe that the Volt is actually a production-intent project. But after driving the car earlier this week, I can testify that the Volt is definitely real.
Hybrids and battery cars are an expensive and tragic joke. The Honda FCX Clarity is proving itself everyday. Hydrogen fuel cell cars are the only viable answer.
Scientists have known for nearly two centuries how to transmit electricity without wires, and the phenomenon has been demonstrated several times before. But it wasn't until the rise of personal electronic devices that the demand for wireless power materialized. In the past few years, at least three companies have debuted prototypes of wireless power devices, though their distance range is relatively limited [see "Power Brokers," next page]. Then last year, a team at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology set the stage for wireless power that works from across a room.
I think this technology, if it could be used for greater amounts of power would solve many of the problems with electric cars. Imagine building grid wires into the lanes of major arterials, or along the guard rails and highways. Cars would have a simple plate on the bottom to be powered by witricity. Most battery cars have a range of 40 miles. That could be used when going "off grid" into side streets and all.
In 2006, David Holtzman decided to do an experiment. Holtzman, a security consultant and former intelligence analyst, was working on a book about privacy, and he wanted to see how much he could find out about himself from sources available to any tenacious stalker. So he did background checks. He pulled his credit file. He looked at Amazon.com transactions and his credit-card and telephone bills. He got his DNA analyzed and kept a log of all the people he called and e-mailed, along with the Web sites he visited.
Are we really talking about ourselves...or "pointers" to ourselves. For example, suppose you have a database with my chronological age: 47. The real crises is the point at which you start making extrapolations about me. It's not a problem that you know the date on which I was born...the problem (and it's always been with us) is what you do with that data. What type of credit or insurance do you give me. What do you think of my political beliefs. The real identity crises in the last 30 years has been the growth of the relational database. This type of database assumes homogeneity across all tables. A person is a person who can be linked to any number of equivalent tables and a conclusion (or segregation) can be drawn. Take my own case. I had one year of very bad financial problems caused by divorce, the Tech Bust and other factors. However, before and after I have maintained a well paying job, steady employment, stable address, money in the bank. The relational database does not have the capacity to take into account catastrophic events because it just averages it all in. It doesn't account for rapid changes in opinion or personality. Suppose I convert from being a Democrat to a Republican. "On average" I am still a Democrat, even though my current opinions would be 180 degrees from a Democrat. The real problem is not the pervasiveness of the technology, but the complete archiac nature and brittleness of it. Object oriented databases may allow for heterogeneous data collection, as would XML documents. Then there is of course our self-written stories on Facebook and Twitter. Imagine if someday, Savings and Loan officers go to our blogs and read about us and our past and make credit decisions based on our own words! Our data capture techniques should be as individualistic as we are. As far as privacy, I say "feh". I want people to know who I am. I want them to get as much as my story as possible when evaluating me. Let it all hang out...let everyone in the neighborhood (just like back in the 60s) know who each other is and what they like to do. Don't hide it, flaunt it!
Jörg Rieckermann snaps on a pair of purple rubber gloves, picks up a crowbar, and levers a manhole cover out of the way. Heres my access to the underworld, Rieckermann, who speaks with a faint German accent, says as he hoists up a barrel-shaped robot suspended above a stream of raw sewage.
I just finished reading "The Ghost Map", a true epidemiology detective story to figure out what was causing cholera outbreaks in London during the mid-1800s. Turns out, it was a common well into which sewage had leaked. We certainly live in a "global village" with stranger and more persistent disease.
When there is only one skull to study and at least 65 scientists studying it, you bet there will be squabbling. Ive been following the scientific news of the diminutive Flores hominids—the meter-high beings with brains the size of an orange—ever since the astonishing fossils were first discovered on the Indonesian island in 2004. Recently, three new papers have emerged, and now things are really getting weird.
Well, how far do you want to take this argument -- that all variations in human form create beings which are necessarily "less smart" than Homo Sapiens? For example, is a whale a retarded human? It's got the big head and flat face a Down syndrome? Is a chimp an ignoramus? No, quite the opposite. They have "intellectual" skills which are now known to be in some instances superior to those of humans (chimps have cognitive recognition skills that are equal or slightly faster than humans).
Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing
Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed
Share links with friends, comment on stories and more
In our December issue, Popular Science names the 100 best innovations of the year: bombproof wallpaper, self-parking cars, the fastest helicopter, and 97 more. Plus inventor profiles and videos.
Check out the best of what's new here.