Researchers are solving the biggest problem in 21st century communication: What kind of emotion is that text supposed to express?

Talking Head
Talking Head University of Cambridge via YouTube

The scourge of 21st century socializing is that text messages have approximately the same emotional capacity as a brick wall, and emoticons make you look like an overzealous 7th grader. When you say you're "fine," does that mean you're chipper or a little bit pissed off?

The solution: Send messages containing an avatar of yourself reading your text, set to the appropriate emotional register. Engineers at the University of Cambridge and Toshiba's Camridge Research Lab have created Zoe, a virtual talking head that can display a range of emotions and change its voice appropriately.

They used the face of British soap actress Zoe Lister, but one day you could upload your own face and voice to make your digital assistant look and talk just like you. It could also be used to help deaf or autistic children learn to lip read and read emotions.

Zoe has six basic emotions -- happy, sad, tender, angry, afraid and neutral -- that can be set at different levels. The pitch, speed and depth of the voice can also be adjusted to the user's preferences. The program that runs Zoe is only requires a few megabytes of storage, so it could easily run on a tablet or smartphone.

From the University of Cambridge statement:

By combining these levels, it becomes possible to pre-set or create almost infinite emotional combinations. For instance, combining happiness with tenderness and slightly increasing the speed and depth of the voice makes it sound friendly and welcoming. A combination of speed, anger and fear makes Zoe sound as if she is panicking. This allows for a level of emotional subtlety which, the designers say, has not been possible in other avatars like Zoe until now.

When the researchers tested how well volunteers could identify Zoe's emotions based on both audio and video, the avatar's success rate (77 percent) scored higher than the actual actress (73 percent).

The talking head still has a tinge of the robotic to her voice, but in terms of expressing realistic human emotion, she's less creepy than FACE, the non-talking humanoid robot head that mimics human facial expressions, but maybe not as polite as the Actroid's new social robot. In terms of being able to express yourself over the chasm of digital distance, it's probably also a little more useful than a virtual hug. Think about it: Wouldn't Siri be better if she yelled at you in your own voice?

[via The Telegraph]

6 Comments

Wttp/jaec45:
I speak 4 languages: English, Profanity, Sarcasm, and Real Crap.

I like this done the same way (3D projection) as the proffesor is image in the move iROBOT! Oh YEA!

Is it just me? Or is anyone else thinking Holly from Red Dwarf?

y'know, if it's somewhat important to express emotion -- maybe you could actually CALL AND TALK. If it's really important you might even arrange a VISIT.

Also, the sender directed emotion won't be any more reliable than a :) or :(.

How much emotive content can be associated with "LOL!" anyway?

BINGO Mrdadrox!!! exact same thought. Only reason I opened the article was to check.

Oh and in English we have many many words. Able to convey most every subtle emotion, learn all about them in a book called the dictionary. Proper descriptive English is not used, it is mostly slang and catch-phrases. So like that was so hip/cool/rad/gnarly the word(s) meanings are not fixed and change with time/use/context/user/age. Without fixed meanings it is just an encoded message. Mostly by the youth to hide what they are saying from parents, use spreads parents learn what it means, new words are made or old words redefined to hide meaning from parents, cycle repeats.
Urban dictionary attempts to keep up but...


140 years of Popular Science at your fingertips.



Popular Science+ For iPad

Each issue has been completely reimagined for your iPad. See our amazing new vision for magazines that goes far beyond the printed page



Download Our App

Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone or Android phone with full articles, images and offline viewing



Follow Us On Twitter

Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed


April 2013: How It Works

For our annual How It Works issue, we break down everything from the massive Falcon Heavy rocket to a tiny DNA sequencer that connects to a USB port. We also take a look at an ambitious plan for faster-than-light travel and dive into the billion-dollar science of dog food.

Plus the latest Legos, Cadillac's plug-in hybrid, a tractor built for the apocalypse, and more.


Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email
Assistant Editor: Colin Lecher | Email
Assistant Editor:Rose Pastore | Email

Contributing Writers:
Rebecca Boyle | Email
Kelsey D. Atherton | Email
Francie Diep | Email
Shaunacy Ferro | Email

circ-top-header.gif
circ-cover.gif
bmxmag-ps