Trackpads have been a remarkably simple solution to what could've been a complicated problem: translating the mouse to a laptop. But pushing that technology any further requires some lateral thinking, and the next dimension laptops might venture into is detecting pressure from your fingers, which would open the door for a larger set of commands. It would change how we navigate, and we might be almost there.
You can watch the video below to get a better sense of exactly how this sort of thing works, but it breaks down like this. You don't click things; there is no way to click things. Instead, the trackpad on your laptop monitors all five of your fingers, as well as how hard they're pressing on the pad. A set of commands based on how you move your fingers lets you move through the operating system; those commands could give you more control over your experience. (Push on top of trackpad to nosedive in a plane, to use a potential, simple example in gaming)
As Gizmodo points out, this isn't the first example of the tech we've seen, but it might be the most visible. Cutting clicking from PCs might not just be more efficient, but also more logical. We've been moving toward that ever since the first mouseless devices, and eliminating everything except finger motion makes sense as a progression. Less movement via the trackpad means less steps to make something happen in Windows 8, which means increased efficiency (after you get used to the weirdness of it, probably).
ForcePad Animation from Synaptics, Inc. on Vimeo.
140 years of Popular Science at your fingertips.
Each issue has been completely reimagined for your iPad. See our amazing new vision for magazines that goes far beyond the printed page
Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone or Android phone with full articles, images and offline viewing
Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed
For our annual How It Works issue, we break down everything from the massive Falcon Heavy rocket to a tiny DNA sequencer that connects to a USB port. We also take a look at an ambitious plan for faster-than-light travel and dive into the billion-dollar science of dog food.
Plus the latest Legos, Cadillac's plug-in hybrid, a tractor built for the apocalypse, and more.

Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email
Assistant Editor: Colin Lecher | Email
Assistant Editor:Rose Pastore | Email
Contributing Writers:
Rebecca Boyle | Email
Kelsey D. Atherton | Email
Francie Diep | Email
Shaunacy Ferro | Email
But why Windows 8?
Yeah, write. Why this OS?
nawozy różnego typu.
Interesting...My Asus UL80-AG w/ Synaptics touchpad softwear is hands-down the absolute worst implementation of a touch pad in any computer I've ever owned. Perhaps it takes two companies to produce such a handicapped laptop, but I primarily blame Synaptics. Case in point. A Vasque hiker uses Gore-Tex, but W.L. Gore makes sure if you use their name with a product you meet minimum standards which insure the Gore-Tex name is only equated with high-performance waterproof footwear that breathes. If Synaptics had any such standards Asus could have never shipped the UL80 which I fight daily. I don't care how wonderful your technology is Synaptics...Learn that the implementation is more important since that is all a end-user is concerned with.
To say something like a goal for efficiency and then Windows..hmmm. You say efficient, so why not Linux? Interface with the assistive software that's already there, and designed to be built on. Efficiency is one major area that proprietary OS's can't match. And Linux can run Windows.