Emotional Messaging A variety of sensors could determine a phone user's emotional state, and convey these feelings through more dynamic text. USTPO via Engadget

Most cell phones are pretty good at auto-correcting the errant spelling and punctuation that can ensue when you’re typing while furious, or sad, or gleeful. But what if the messages you’re sending could also convey those emotions embedded in your words? RIM filed a patent for just such a messaging system, which can determine the emotional context of a text in a way that goes beyond the little :-) we all know.

It would use a BlackBerry’s accelerometer, front-facing camera, pressure sensors and even future galvanic skin-response sensors to gauge a person’s emotional state. Galvanic sensors could tell a person's heart rate, blood pressure and other biometric data, which could be used to figure out how they're feeling.

The emotional context of the entered text might be determined as it’s being typed, or maybe after the fact. Then software would change the way the text is presented to convey the assumed emotion.

Say, for instance, you’re too busy to meet a friend, and this is incredibly frustrating and angst-causing. Judging by the haphazard way your fingers stab the keyboard, your anguished expression read by the camera, and maybe the phone’s trembling in your hand, your phone figures out you are agitated. Your phrase “Work is frantic” is translated into an angry, slanty font, red letters and a larger print. Maybe later you’re excited and happy — your text becomes pink or yellow.

RIM explains in more detail in its patent application, posted today at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

[via Engadget]

2 Comments

Yah, what a great udea -- not.

Just what we need, people trying to analyze the state of their relationship by the 'tone' of the text.

Or your boss trying to decide if you're REALLY sick.

Next their will be emo apps to fix up your text emoting.

I could live without this -- even if I did do texts.

"Just what we need, people trying to analyze the state of their relationship by the 'tone' of the text."

This. Most people are already borderline illiterate and are completely unable to understand subtext written in messages over the internet. Additionally, most people are too dumb to understand when or how to convey an emotion in text. We all know 'that guy / gal' that clogs every single thing they write with:

1) LOL / haha
2) :) ;) :D :X etc.
3) ... ... ... ...

Let's take the example written above. If I'm talking to someone, I'm going to say, "I can't, work is frantic!" with a bit of inflection to convey my frustration. This is not accurately portrayed by a text saying "I can't, work is ***~~~FRANTIC~~~***!!!!!!". If you talked like that you'd be slapped on the spot.

Point being, this technology would do nothing but make texting even more moronic than it already is. Most of the idiots out there would think you need emotional context on every word, and next thing you know, our texts are as annoying to read as this:

"**SOMEBODY** got _A_ ~~~{{DUI}}~~~ @ -((WERK))- LOLOOLOOL <3 <3 OMG!!!^^^

Do we really need to dumb-down the dumbest thing in human history even more?


140 years of Popular Science at your fingertips.

Innovation Challenges



Popular Science+ For iPad

Each issue has been completely reimagined for your iPad. See our amazing new vision for magazines that goes far beyond the printed page



Download Our App

Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone or Android phone with full articles, images and offline viewing



Follow Us On Twitter

Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed


February 2013: How To Build A Hero

Engineers are racing to build robots that can take the place of rescuers. That story, plus a city that storms can't break and how having fun could lead to breakthrough science.

Also! A leech detective, the solution to America's train-crash problems, the world's fastest baby carriage, and more.



Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email

Contributing Writers:
Clay Dillow | Email
Rebecca Boyle | Email
Colin Lecher | Email
Emily Elert | Email

Intern:
Shaunacy Ferro | Email

circ-top-header.gif
circ-cover.gif