DARPA has some details about its new Robotics Challenge, which we first told you about last week. Anyone have a robot that can drive a car for a $2 million prize?
Formally announced Tuesday, the new challenge will take place during the next two years, with the first phase kicking off in October. The goal is to develop robots that can work in dangerous environments engineered for humans, not robots. They could potentially protect humans from harm by making repairs or scouting terrain. DARPA specifically mentions the nuclear disaster at Japan’s Fukushima Daiichi power plant as an example of why this type of robot would be useful.
The challenge is not focused strictly on humanoid robots, but some of the tasks — like driving a car and climbing a ladder — could be difficult for non-humanoid body plans to accomplish.Interestingly, the competition is open to international teams, even those with no connections to an American company or lab — DARPA may be aware that American development of humanoid robots has lagged behind our counterparts in Europe and Asia.
Like we first heard last week, the challenge consists of several difficult tasks. The robot must:
These are just examples; the formal challenge will be more specific, according to the solicitation. DARPA might make it more difficult depending on how things proceed.
Competitors can take part along three tracks: Track A would involve building a complete system, including software and hardware; Track B could be software only, developed using competitive funds; Track C could be software only, using a competitor’s own funds; and Track D would be a complete system developed at the competitor’s own expense.
The agency is opting for a big-tent view, seeking input from universities, companies of all sizes and even individuals. “Achieving true innovation in robotics, and thus success in this challenge, will require contributions from communities beyond traditional robotics developers,” the agency’s announcement says.
In that sense, DARPA may be taking a cue from the success of the Flypmode crowdsourced car, also the brainchild of a nontraditional source. And the agency expects this competition to stimulate a new generation of robot enthusiasts and builders, such as through the FIRST robotics competition.
“The work of the global robotics community brought us to this point—robots do save lives, do increase efficiencies and do lead us to consider new capabilities,” said Gill Pratt, DARPA program manager, in a statement. “What we need to do now is move beyond the state of the art.”
Five amazing, clean technologies that will set us free, in this month's energy-focused issue. Also: how to build a better bomb detector, the robotic toys that are raising your children, a human catapult, the world's smallest arcade, and much more.


Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email
Assistant Editor: Colin Lecher | Email
Assistant Editor: Rose Pastore | Email
Contributing Writers:
Rebecca Boyle | Email
Kelsey D. Atherton | Email
Francie Diep | Email
Shaunacy Ferro | Email
ROFL It sounds logical DARPA developping androids to save people. Sorry, I'm not buying it. Most people will be scared when DARPA would develop android soldiers but sure that's the goal. Sure there will be profits. There will be androids also saving people and enter dangerous envoirnments. If they want to take away the fear they let congres and the senate aprove a law against androids carrying weapons. And persue the same laws in the UN. Otherwise I will see a huge unemployment with android workers and police and army androids. While we humans have votes I will vote against the makers.
From the movie "I-Robot", I have this clear vision when the Robot does not allow the old woman\grandmother to go to church as it announces it is holding her captive, while the world goes through this logical change for humanities safety!
Now in the movie it was the big brain computer controlling all the robots, but in our life, it could easily be one central government.
.............................
Science sees no further than what it can sense, i.e. facts.
Religion sees beyond the senses, i.e. faith.
Open your mind and see!
LoL , I can't do most of these tasks .
In the principle of Do No Harm, it must be unhackable!
It is not unlikely that the disasters to which they will respond are man-made cyber-catastrophes, I think an unimpeachable security protocol is the foundation. Otherwise, it's a very bad 1950s science fiction B-movie made real.
come on guys, the self-aware robot is still a long way off, if at all possible. in the meantime we could use these kinds of robots for dangerous jobs which no human would be willing to do.
Um.
Three tracks,
A B C D?
That is so funny, 3 tracks, ABCD, good catch.
So much for the editors of POPSCI.:(
.............................
Science sees no further than what it can sense, i.e. facts.
Religion sees beyond the senses, i.e. faith.
Open your mind and see!