
My investigation began in Brownsville, Texas, on the front line of what some have taken to calling a border war. Brownsville lies just above the mouth of the Rio Grande, at the southern tip of the largely Spanish-speaking urban sprawl of 1.2 million people that fills the lower Rio Grande Valley. My initial destination was a Border Patrol station, where I would visit a state-of-the-art command-and-control center. When I arrived at the station, just in time for the 4-p.m.-to-midnight shift, I was immediately confronted with one of the reasons they call it a war.
Customs and Border Patrol does not expect, or want, to stop everything that crosses the border.At the daily muster, where Border Patrol agents get their marching orders for the day, much of the talk was about Jaime Zapata, a special agent with Immigration and Customs Enforcement who had been shot dead six days earlier by members of Los Zetas, a Mexican drug cartel, at a roadblock several hundred miles south of the border. Zapata was both a Brownsville native and a former Border Patrol agent, so his murder was a major event. After his funeral, hundreds of law-enforcement vehicles, sirens wailing, would pass through the city as residents lined the streets waving American flags. Some of the agents I spoke to attributed the relative quiet along the border that week to the Zapata killing—the bad guys were waiting to see what the American response would be. The Gulf Cartel, a rival organization whose own war with the Zetas for control of transborder commerce had resulted in more than 1,000 deaths over the past year, denounced Zapata’s killing. “It’s clear that the federal government should act without delay against these assassins,” the cartel said in a statement. “Because the spilling of blood in the country is now drowning society.”
I was unable to attend the Zapata funeral, but I would eventually see high-definition video footage of the burial ceremony taken from a CBP helicopter. The video was shot from about three miles out; the mourners were probably not even aware that a helicopter was in the area. I watched playback of that video feed on the Web portal of a system called the Big Pipe, a surveillance network developed by Kenneth Knight, the deputy executive director of national air-security operations for the Office of Air and Marine (OAM), a lesser-known division of CBP that operates the largest law-enforcement air force in the world.
Knight is a physically imposing, ruddy man with a disarming Midwestern accent. When we met in Brownsville, he was dressed in the khaki jumpsuit that all OAM pilots wear, and it turned out that he was a helicopter pilot himself. I had no idea who he was, but he already knew about me. “I need to talk to you,” he said, decisively hijacking my tour of the station. Knight was in town to coordinate air support for the Zapata funeral, and he didn’t have much time for me right then, but he gave me a quick briefing on the Big Pipe and then invited me to Washington, where he promised to give a more detailed demonstration of his project’s capabilities.
What was the Big Pipe? The answer wasn’t clear at first, but Knight emphasized the concept of “total domain awareness” and strongly suggested that he possessed the means of attaining that state. Based on the briefing I received in Brownsville, the Big Pipe sounded like it might be the framework for the elusive “common operating picture” that would integrate and rationalize the increasingly unwieldy data streams generated by our high-definition surveillance systems. Perhaps the Big Pipe could succeed where SBInet had failed.
Late that afternoon, when the low angle of the sun was beginning to lengthen the shadows, agent Dan Milian took me down to the Rio Grande to get a closer look at the border itself. Weedy, fast-growing brush often chokes the meandering banks of the Rio Grande as well as the no-man’s-land between the river and the border fence. Carrizo river cane, an invasive species that aids and abets the passage of other such species, grows everywhere. Narrow trails snake through the tall grass.
The Brownsville & Matamoros Bridge, the oldest crossing in Brownsville, loomed behind us as we walked along the river. Broken shards of glass twinkled in the dense ground cover, and thick vegetation did a good job of hiding the ubiquitous debris of human civilization: cast-off soft-drink bottles and small articles of clothing, socks, T-shirts, a sneaker. Torn black plastic trash bags rustled in the light breeze, especially along the landing spots worn slick from the passage of illegal bodies who slip out of the oily black nighttime river, briefly pause, quickly pull dry clothing and supplies from the trash bags, and then dress themselves and furtively crawl, scramble, or run toward the black steel pickets. The fence can be climbed, and so they climb.
In 2006, Congress mandated the construction of a new barrier along the southwest border, and since then contractors have built just under 700 miles of such fencing, at an average cost of $2.8 million per mile. Environmentalists and cynical bystanders in the border communities hate it. Farmers who are cut off from their fields resent the inconvenience. People whose homes ended up on the wrong side of the fence feel sacrificed and abandoned. Ocelots and other lovely wild creatures are said to be experiencing disruptions of their migratory wanderings. Smugglers, meanwhile, have used a catapult to hurl drugs into Arizona, as well as a portable ramp that permits vehicles to drive right over the fence.
It’s easy to laugh at fencing that abruptly ends in a tangle of brush. But agents here say they love even the intermittent version because it gives them a bit more time to respond to border-crossing attempts, which in Brownsville must be measured in seconds. The fence adds perhaps a minute to the equation, Milian told me, and it also channels the flow of aliens away from populated areas out into the brush, where the response time is measured in hours and days.
A heavily trafficked and well-maintained dirt road ran alongside the border fence. Dust lay thick on the ground and offered up a rich testimony to a tracker versed in the art of sign cutting. Agents drag bundles of tires behind their vehicles along such roads, both here on the line and out in the brush country far from the river, and check back periodically to see if any signs have appeared. The best trackers can tell from a footprint whether the body in question is heavy or light, fit or exhausted, his approximate age and height, how fast he is moving, whether he is carrying a load, and how heavy that load is likely to be. I’ve been told that at least one agent can cut sign from horseback at a gallop.
We were in the middle of town, right next to a port of entry. The river was perhaps 10 yards across, and the railroad bridge of the port not more than 50 yards away. Even here, they cross. We walked down a trail looking for fresh signs of traffic, and I noticed how much thicker the brush was on the other side. We observed no signs of human activity, but such appearances were deceptive. Matamoros was right there; people lived and worked and performed their daily routines just a few hundred yards away. Down here, the cartels often employ spotters to watch the river. Sometimes they fish, but often they just sit and watch from the bank, staring with impunity and insolence or maybe just boredom. The cartels choose when and where to cross; they control the other side, the “Mike side.” They own the monopoly on human traffic just as they do the traffic in drugs. No one freelances anymore.
On our side, a Border Patrol camera tower looked almost pretty against the evening sky as it peered, from a height of 60 feet, up and down this broad bend in the river.
single pageThe incredible innovations, like drone swarms and perpetual flight, bringing aviation into the world of tomorrow. Plus: today's greatest sci-fi writers predict the future, the science behind the summer's biggest blockbusters, a Doctor Who-themed DIY 'bot, the organs you can do without, and much more.


Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email
Assistant Editor: Colin Lecher | Email
Assistant Editor: Rose Pastore | Email
Contributing Writers:
Kelsey D. Atherton | Email
Francie Diep | Email
Shaunacy Ferro | Email
Excellent article Roger! Have you written about operation “Fast and Furious”?
For over 20 years an organization in ohio has been researching and using technology that enables them to see and talk to people from a central location without visible equipment. it was being used before haarp or gwen were finished. This technology has been kept secret from the public, only a small group of people, including police and doctors knew about it. it has grown. as of 2012 nearly all police, firefighters and medical professionals in columbus, ohio are aware of it. most cops in the rest of the state along with indiana are also aware. maybe some doctors and nurses are in fear for their own safety and that of their families while the police and mental health professionals seem to have been advanced to their position because of their willingness to work with this organization. please read dttv.info
Mr. Knight's dream of video fusion is a Big Pipe dream. It is a concept of tomorrow, and always will be.
Mr. Knight killed a competing system (nicknamed Broad Pipe) that was based on the commercial off-the-shelf Inmarsat system.
At a tenth of the size and a tenth of the cost, the system was ready for immediate deployment upon the entire fleet of CBP aircraft. Instead, it was forced out by the big budget Big Pipe program (primarily to justify the expenditure of funds on other components of the Big Pipe system).
The new Multi-role Enforcement Aircraft (MEA) was delivered incomplete because certain Big Pipe technology hadn't yet made it to market.
A bright light needs to be shined on the CBP air program; the taxpayers deserve more.
All this would not be happening if New York or Washington D.C. were where El Paso or Los Angeles is! There would be no debate, and no illegal immigration.
Good point D13.
Sometimes a change in perspective is all that is needed.
Sometimes while finding a solution to a problem it is also use full to identify what is NOT working, and stop wasting energy on that.
How dare a citizen to go out and consume illegal drugs and thus finance the cartels? If us citizens would stop taking drugs there would be no drug problem.
US is the one that needs help to be without drugs and violence.
Plenty of crimes in US every year : 30,000 gunshot fatalities.
This keeps the police and feds plenty busy.
Nothing was stated in this article that isn't common sense or could be found with a simple Google search. Motion detectors and cameras are pretty standard kit. Drones are becoming ubiquitous, soon they will monitor your daily commute to work. As the various agencies that patrol our boarders are extensions of our government I am sure there are protocols in place that prevent too much information being given to a blogger. We lost our chance to "help" Mexico when gave tax breaks to Corporate America to outsource and they went to India instead of heading south. I am curious though, with all the tech at the border, why do we continue to fail to find the underground highways the cartels keep building.
Good article. I was happy to read Mark Borkowski's observation, because it's something I've been saying for quite awhile. Borkowski said that a large part of the problem is artificially created by our Congress and its irrational and arbitrary immigration and guest-worker policies.
People unthinkingly paint everyone who crosses the border illegally with the same brush, but there is a huge difference between drug traffickers and people who simply want to work here to have a better life. If Congress just changed the guest-worker laws so we could hand everyone a green card at the border--fingerprint, ID, and register them--and welcome them to work in the U.S., it would solve a lot of problems at once. One of which would be, as Borkowski said, that it "would cut off a lot of the traffic BETWEEN the points of entry. In fact, at a certain point, you would only have the really bad people left, the drug smugglers and the terrorists." It's not amnesty or citizenship, but a very simple way to allow people who want to work here to do so legally and to increase the pool of hard working, inexpensive labor (and increase tax revenue...are you listening politicians?). It would also end the tragic human trafficking trade and the coyotes who profit by it.
Then CBP could focus on the real criminals instead of being overwhelmed with weeding out good people whose only crime is wanting to work here so badly that they are willing to circumvent the inexcusably stupid guest-worker (and immigration) system governed by INS...which is arguably the most ridiculous bureaucracy in the federal government.
I grew up on the border of mexico/new mexico. Nobody really cares a whole lot that Mexican illegals are coming here to do landscaping and crop harvesting, its the drug cartels and human slave traffickers who are the problem. You run into a pack of illegal's in the desert and it's not a problem. Run into drug cartel members and your gonna get your throat slit. If everyone knew how dangerous these cartels are then there would be no argument about taking harsher measures against them.
Popular science makes for so much innocent fun. But what you've written here is a thoroughly depressing view of a thoroughly depressing piece of human culture. You've written a tech view of a human story.
There's no indication anywhere in your piece that people living the other side of this man-made border are human beings with god-given inalienable rights. They're just aliens, stupid greedy, blips on a screen who try to cross walls and fall off. They're bad guys tainted by involvement in drugs.
Meanwhile the good guys have lots of popular tech - blimps and computers and CCTV. Plus they can even read tracks from a galloping horse; they're almost John Wayne!
As someone who grew up there you hint at the real place that lies behind all the concrete and tech. But there's a great deal more to be said about the human stories and reasons behind economic migration. And evidence of what's going on in the war on drugs. Why do individual Americans want to consume so many drugs. Why does the state choose to persist in a war on drugs which creates a vast unregulated business in criminal hands just like alcohol prohibition did before it?
Dark-skinned people are responding in a normal and predictable way to economic opportunity. They're supplying produce that Americans want. What you describe is a state-sponsored attempt to resist market forces, to solve an essentially human problem with technology deployed with a military mindset.
The US will spend a lot of money. It won't solve the problem. No-one will be happy.
And in writing this story the way you have you show no sign of empathy with the key players involved. From the perspective of liberty, justice, and loving thy neighbour this story has lost the plot. Don't close yourself off to the human aspect; I bet the more you look into it the more compelling it will get...
It is in USA tolerance of the companies that hire illegal aliens that inspire illegal people to enter out country. A poor person, with no education and no opportunity, living in an unsafe environment wants to escape his local situation for a poor job in the USA and a government that protects the people, even the illegal peoples. How can you blame an illegal alien from leaving his bad situation for a better one?
Even those caught enter the USA illegally, are given food, a bed, clothing if needed, medical attention for a short time. This is a step up from the nothing they have from where they come from. Imagine if you are poor and without a job, home and food and one day as you sit on a pile of dirt you see some cancerous bump, broken arm, a bullet hole, skin disease or just any other health problem on your body and you do not feel that well, too. In your country there is no help. So just enter good old USA and we are obligated by law to help the sick illegal alien, prior to returning him back to his country.
The USA tolerance of companies that support illegal aliens is the problem. Remove the rainbow and its pot of gold. And the wall is a good idea too. But in reality, the flow of illegal aliens will never stop and long as the poor are poor and are being helped in the USA. At best at times, we only slow it down.
..........................................
See life in all its beautiful colors, and
from different perspectives too!
Great article, very insightful and helpful in understanding more so what is happening with the power that our government wields.
At the same time I also find my self considering what will happen if this Big Pipe were to be turned against the american people?
I am in China at the moment and I am sure that in this nation the Big Pipe would be easily integrated into the systems of control... but then again this is China, not the USA. We must understand that different systems need different rules and measures. But what works for China will not work for the US.
China is a nation that still follows the Emperors way of rule (the rulers are above the law - so who you know determines what freedoms and influence you have). But the US is a nation of Laws where every one including the president is bound to the law and all are accountable to the law.
So if we, in our wisdom, should elect a government of people who are so corrupt that they have no frills about using their power to stay in power, how much would the Big Pipe help them in that endeavor? I think of the Born Ultimatum movies and that's what I see.
Correct me if I am wrong.
D13 01/17/12 at 11:16 am
What do you think Mexico is - a medieval dungeon, a Russian gulag? Mexico is one of the richest countries in the world. The richest man in the world lives in Mexico City. Mexico is loaded with natural resources. Mexico’s economy is better than ours. Mexico has a lower unemployment rate than we do. Mexico has a much lower deficit than we do. We owe them NOTHING. We are always on the short end of the trade stick. This is the United States of America … NOT the United Nations …. NOT the Mexican Dept of Welfare.
If a tomato can cross the border into the US from Mexico, I don't see why a person can't cross the border. Oh I forgot, we have laws. Its our law against other people. Only we are allowed to be where we our, except for famous people, rich people and fast runners having the ability to jump high fences.
Not to be a cynic, but something doesn't make sense? With all that technology and surveillance, mega quantities of illicit drugs are still flowing across the border like the Mississippi River? I wonder how that is possible without collusion between entities on both sides of the border?
The cartels are making billions in illicit drug sales and I would wager that there are both Mexican and American officials making lots of money in bribes and payoffs?
I have been on both sides of the border off and on for almost 20 years now and have gone through the Border Patrol checkpoints many, many times, both Mexican and American, and they don't seem like they would miss much, with all the technology, scanners, K9 units etc etc?
One time I got a 'red light' going into Mexico at Nogales, I was packed for an extended stay in Magdalena de Kino, Sonora, a little town about 50 miles South of the border, working as a bio-medical engineer on a project for the company I was at the time employed. Anyway, the Mexican border agents had me open the trunk on my midsize rental car and they pulled out my clothes and laptop and whatnot, then they asked why I had so many pairs of jeans? I explained in Spanish that I was going to be staying in Mexico for a couple of months, so I needed to have some clothes to wear?
I guess they have had a problem with Mexicans buying jeans in the US, then selling them on the Mexican side? They somehow were avoiding some type of tariff by doing this?
So, if they are that ticky-tack, then how in the heck are the cartels moving mega quantities of coke, heroin, methamphetamine and pot across the border into this country every day of the week?
Like I said, somebody has got to be cooperating on this side of the border? Unfortunately, it wouldn't be a surprise to me if the corruption ended up being at the higher levels of the political spectrum, rather than just among the peons?
A sad situation all around............
d13 said:
"Besides giving terrorists and drug cartels enought details on our border technology to effectively make it useless, was the goal of this article to get POPSCI readers to post ways to cirumvent these "kool" technologies?"
Apparently d13 does not realize that the information found in the article is neither classified, difficult to find on the Internet nor hard to figure out given time and observation.
I feel we are turning america into a guilded cage, crusted with invisible, razor sharp barb wire. I do not welcome this change in the least. The creator of the Big Pipe said himself, the older program failed because people tried solving various human, sopcial, political problems with technology. And they didnt know what problem they were trying to solve with what tech. I think his argument is easily turned back in his face to show something he didnt intend. People are trying to meet these issues with technology, trying to pound all the square pegs into round holes with brute force instead of actually solving the problems themselves.
I especially object to broadening the border patrols inlfuence and power beyond the border with all the instances of items being 'confiscated' and never returned. Such items as cameras, computers, laptops, these items are expensive and while a few might be honestly being lost under the current ridiculous system in place, I feel alot are also outright theft. We have too many instances of abuse/theft at the border and in our airports to justify giving these people more power.