# Computer Algorithms Quantify How Much a Photo Has Been Retouched

Model Undone By Mathematical Models The real image is at left; the retouched one at center; and a vector field heat map showing the distortions in the retouched image is at right. Farid and Kee/PNAS

Magazine images are so heavily retouched nowadays that the models hardly look human at all, with absurdly flawless skin and unrealistic body shapes that drive equally unrealistic expectations. It’s so unbelievable, and so potentially damaging to readers’ self-perception, that even the American Medical Association has condemned preposterous postproduction retouching.

Now a team of computer scientists has figured out how to quantify this retouching, using mathematical models to reverse the models’ body revisions. Hany Farid, a computer scientist at Dartmouth College, and PhD student Eric Kee developed algorithms that look for geometric changes, such as elongated necks, enlarged breasts or slimmed waistlines, and photometric changes, like de-wrinkled skin or (egads) removal of freckles.

To do this, Farid and Kee gathered 468 examples of before-and-after photos, including some that are anatomically impossible and others that are just hilarious. Among the selections is a skincare ad featuring the British model Twiggy, which was deemed so absurd it was banned in England, and a particularly infamous Ralph Lauren ad that shaved inches, and all sense of human organ proportion, from the waistline of model Filippa Hamilton.

(Farid's website has a few more examples.) Then they found 390 human participants, recruited through Amazon’s Mechanical Turk service, and asked them to rank the level of alteration on a scale of 1 (very similar) to 5 (very different). Each worker was given 70 images. Then Farid and Kee developed eight sets of rules that embody the whole suite of photo retouching possibilities.

The algorithms aren’t perfect — the system over- or under-estimates the degree of alteration depending on certain factors that seem more or less important to a computer than a human. For instance, one before-and-after image shows a man with no front teeth who gets a Photoshopped set of pearly whites. The algorithms consider this a minor difference from a photometric and geometric perspective, but it certainly makes a huge difference in his appearance.

Still, it’s a good way to tell how much an image has been digitally altered, Farid and Kee say. They would like to see this system used to provide some perspective for readers of the big fashion glossies.

“Providing a rating of photo retouching alongside a published photo can inform the public of the extent to which photos have strayed from reality,” they write. “Although it remains to be seen if this rating can mediate the adverse effects of being inundated with unrealistic body images.”

The work is published in this week’s edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Thank you POPSCI!

Thank you POPSCI!

and the sad part is that the new generation look up to these "fakes". thank you science for exposing this.

_________________
The people of the world only divide into two kinds, One sort with brains who hold no religion, The other with religion and no brain.

- Abu-al-Ala al-Marri

I would like to see a weekly TV show or webcast. We would have to have a host, preferably a comic. They would bring up the hottest images of the week and blast them with this program. The air brushing is getting out of hand. I saw Adam Levine hugging his girlfriend’s leg on some cover last week. They air brushed her leg to make it look fuller. In the process they managed to remove the majority of Adams stomach, nothing but black space behind. He looked all alien and anorexic. Touching up a blemish is one thing, but altering the human form to extraterrestrial proportions to sell anything is something entirely different.

bleh...start buy making obese barbies...cut it at the source

The third picture is almost identical to the picture from the experiment "tracking men's eye movement".

This is soooo true... We should definitely start making people feel good about being fat and we should absolutely drive people to be average instead of extraordinary. What a better message to send.

The worst part is they take people are who are already H-O-T and make them feel inferior, insufficient, and ugly when in fact it is the after image that looks gross.

## Popular Tags

### June 2013: American Energy Independence

Five amazing, clean technologies that will set us free, in this month's energy-focused issue. Also: how to build a better bomb detector, the robotic toys that are raising your children, a human catapult, the world's smallest arcade, and much more.

Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email
Assistant Editor: Colin Lecher | Email
Assistant Editor: Rose Pastore | Email

Contributing Writers:

Kelsey D. Atherton | Email
Francie Diep | Email
Shaunacy Ferro | Email

bmxmag-ps