The U.S. military has a data problem. If knowing is half the battle then it's the half the Pentagon should never lose, at least in theory. But in practice, the military's data problem is significant, vexing, and given the current pace of acceleration, technologically intimidating. Just two years ago, there were roughly a dozen NATO aircraft flying surveillance missions over Afghanistan at any given time. Now, there are more than 50 Predator and Reaper drones in the air at once, and all of them are dumping fat streams of data to the ground all the time.
Meanwhile, more drones are joining the fights in Afghanistan and Pakistan, in the Horn of Africa and over Iraq and Yemen and elsewhere. Intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) sensors are proliferating on conventional manned aircraft. The data streams are outpacing the DoD's capacity to organize and store them and generating so much noise, so much unusable intel, that analysts can't sort the relevant information from the useless. And all this is happening in an environment where anything slower than real time can take a toll in human lives.
"We're swimming in sensors, and we need to be careful we don't drown in the data," says Dave Deptula, CEO and managing director for defense technology problem-solver MAV6. This isn't the first time Deptula has said this, and it won't be the last. In his previous post as the first deputy chief of staff for intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance, Lt. Gen. Deptula was in charge of planning and implementing the entire U.S. Air Force's ISR strategy, and he saw the data flood topping its levees firsthand.
"The unavoidable truths are that data velocities are accelerating and the current way we handle data is really overwhelmed by this tsunami" Deptula says. "So we're going to have to begin exploring different ways to meet the growing challenges of hyper-scale workloads."
Simply growing the military's rackspace--and that's been much of the strategy for dealing with the problem to date--isn't going to tame the flood. The DoD doesn't just need new storage methods, but completely new concepts of operation that blend novel storage architectures, all kinds of digital semantics, and--critically--a healthy dose of artificial intelligence.
Someday soon, computer programs will view, tag, organize, and store hundreds and thousands of video streams simultaneously, deciding what sensor data is relevant to the fight at hand, what needs immediate attention, and what needs to be filed away. Language interfaces will let analysts instantly search their databases with natural language queries like something straight out of Star Trek. Drones themselves will even become computerized intelligence analysts, combing through their own data streams in realtime to highlight only the choicest bits of intel. These technologies are already in the works, and this is how technology will save the military from its technology.
Sounds like a good job for Watson!
I am sorry to report that some troops did not receive proper drone support do to network lag and casualties resulted.
Well, we knew that this was going to be the hard nut to crack when this system was first implemented. Our domestic taxes on wireless broadband access; that are higher in some states than taxes on liquor or cigarettes, are supposed to be going into building infrastructure specifically to combat these trends that are only going to get worse. Sadly, those taxes are not building anything except personal bank accounts for the masters of our universe. Those who think there is plenty of time to come up with some sort of magic bullet fix. But one simple thing is in the way of any magic bullet fix, and that's the fact that other countries' citizens have access to domestic consumer computer speeds that those who would normally be called on to come up with the big fix cannot access. And once again, America, China is laughing it's ass off about it, as is Japan and India. Our president SAYS that we need our citizens to stand up, dig in, and get creative in the face of the emerging third world...but we aren't ACTUALLY allowed to. Now that we are sending our latest airliners to those countries, they'll be able to pull off mass airlifting of troops when they decide to forcefully expand their borders, and considering that they ALL have been inside our most sensitive systems plenty of times, when they decide to it will be a fait accompli with the knowledge they've gained thus far. One more time, I'll make my doomcrier rounds; begging our nation to GET OFF THE TECHNOLOGY TIT, because just as in Viet Nam and all the other places since, we aren't being ALLOWED to win the field of contention in the new battlespace.
so now robots will be controlling the robots... eventually they will control us!
Consider things we take for granted and no longer notice in life.
The city traffic light system is computer controlled. The environmental systems in a building are computer controlled. Much public works systems are computer controlled.
You put a search request into GOOGLE decides what you see on the first page, the order of things. So even part of your thought process is influence by computers.
I am sure the list is 100s times longer than this.
We are very much already controlled by computers.
Sounds like they need to enroll in ml-class.org
To start with, why do they need those huge earphones? I do better at home.