Feature
Weather monitoring is vital, but don't mention the C-word

NPOESS Engineers begin integration of the Medium resolution Visible and Infra-red Imager or VIIRS into the NPOESS Preparatory Project NASA/Ball Aerospace

This year has seen some phenomenally bizarre weather, from deadly tornadoes ripping through the Midwest and South to historic snowmelt-related flooding on the Mississippi River. Most hurricane forecasters are saying it’s about to get worse — the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration projected Thursday that the Atlantic basin is likely to see 12 to 18 named storms this season.

Amid all this, the country’s future weather prediction capabilities could be stymied by a battle in Washington.

During the budget battle earlier this spring, Congress cut funding for a new polar-orbiting satellite, which is designed to monitor atmospheric temperatures and pressure, severe weather, fires and other manmade and natural disasters, and to provide continuous climate data. If it does not get built, the country faces a satellite gap, which could affect forecasters’ ability to predict the weather.

The key word here is climate.

“Weather is apolitical, but climate is unfortunately not,” Bill Sullivan, a director at Raytheon Intelligence and Information Systems and program manager for the new satellite, said in an interview.


Click here to launch a gallery of images of NASA's NPP satellite

NOAA Administrator Jane Lubchenco said at a news conference Thursday that the agency’s satellite program is in limbo.

This is at least the fourth time in the past few years that a climate-monitoring project has fallen victim to either terrible luck or bad politics. First the Orbiting Carbon Observatory failed to reach orbit, then NASA’s aerosol-monituring Glory mission also died during launch. Last month we told you about the Deep Space Climate Observatory, languishing in a box in Maryland. Now a satellite called JPSS is in danger of losing its funding.

Here’s a bit of history: Until last year, NASA, NOAA and the Department of Defense were going to share a brand-new polar-orbiting satellite called the National Polar Orbiting Operational Environmental Satellite System (NPOESS). But after a few years of planning and design work, the government decided the military and civilian agencies didn’t play well together and divorced the project, giving the DOD its own satellite. The existing civilian project, called NPP for NPOESS Preparatory Project, will serve NASA and NOAA only, and is planned for launch in October. It just completed a thermal test.

It is supposed to have a companion successor called the Joint Polar Satellite System, and NOAA requested $1.06 billion in this year’s budget to build it. Then the federal budget stalemate happened, and everything was funded at 2010 levels as Congress and the White House wrangled.

“The message that was getting to Congress was that NOAA needed a billion dollars to do climate research,” said Sullivan, who is Raytheon’s program manager for the JPSS. As a result, the funding was not approved.

Since the funding cuts, NOAA — and contractors like Raytheon — have started marketing the satellite's weather forecasting abilities, not just its utility in informing climate models.

Polar-orbiting satellites can provide global weather coverage, which is useful when trying to make future weather predictions. Geostationary satellites, like the ones that provide the satellite radar imagery on your local news, only look at a specific section of the planet. The National Weather Service needs both sets of data to complete accurate forecasting.

NPP is a new polar-orbiting satellite that will replace NOAA’s previous orbiters, Sullivan said. It will circle the Earth 512 miles above the surface, completing about 14 orbits every day.

“We’re going to see just a huge increase in the amount of data that can be collected ... NPP provides an enormous amount of capability that is currently not on orbit,” Sullivan said.

NPP will have a life span of about five years, at which point JPSS should be ready to replace it. Sullivan said NOAA needs funding this year for construction so the JPSS project doesn’t fall behind schedule. NOAA is hoping the project will get funding this year, but it looks doubtful, Sullivan said. Meanwhile, the agency is preparing for a budget battle next year, he said.

"If the program doesn't get funded at the appropriate level in 2012, it will fall behind, which is bad for all of us," he said.

“Not having satellites and not applying their latest capabilities could spell disaster,” said NOAA's Lubchenko. “We are likely looking at a period of time a few years down the road where we will not be able to do severe storm warnings and long-term weather forecasts that people have come to expect today.”

11 Comments

Everyone knows, the development of the Squirrel detector is a much higher priority, so they do not accident bomb those little critters, geez!

Knowing in advance when a disastrous hurricane, storm or tornado is so less critical.

Yes, I am being sarcastic here.

your sarcasm is getting old, really, every comment, WTF...typical politics, all the republicans can hear is climate change, ignorant of the real facts and how this is required, it's not a luxury, before someone starts a rant, i also don't like the democrats

His momma always said, life is like a box of sarcasm, you never know what your gonna git...

Politics = inneficiency

Equation above is sad, but true, kinda like your companie's accountant, the IT department, etc. are PURE overhead, they become a necessity, but it still would be so Ideal to have none of it.

I vote send the satellite.

Actually global warming is just the beginning. Eventually enough long term warming will repeat each year, to cause more of the glacier ice to melt and permafrost frost as well. After all this fresh water dumps into the oceans will slow or stop circulating and then the upper and lower hemispheres will go into a deed deep freeze. It will not be like the movie -The Day After Tomorrow- but it will happen. Add to this the over fishing of the oceans, the acidification of the oceans killing the fish, the added cold climate and major starvation will occur worldwide. I will not see it happen, but it is all likely to happen in the next couple of hundred years. I am very much for Weather Satellites.

Have a nice day!

While we were taking a class to become certified in Symbolic Coder, an energy healing method, we looked out the window and spotted a huge dark storm cloud approaching. Some people wanted to leave before the storm hit.

Then one person mentioned that she had one of Slim Spurling's helical copper rings. She mounted it against the open window and we created an energy vortex in the room. The energy swirled around and then exited the building through the ring. As the storm disappeared, we continued with the class.

Later, when watching the weather report, the weather man said he was most astonished to see the storm veer away from the city and dissipate, contrary to his forecast.

By adjusting the three spheres on the ring, the energy can be made to flow out at an angle. By placing the ring on a rotating turntable, the energy flow spreads out in a circle around the house, causing storms to veer away, leaving nice sunny weather.

Possibly this set up could dissipate the large tornados that we have been experiencing further south.

The problem with trying to track...and say it with me, Climate Change, is that it is..by word structure... changing. It won't only be warming.. it's going to get weird.
The weather will reflect that (as it has been).

That's why we need the weather satellites to tell us little ant-like people here on the surface what on earth is going on with the weather patterns, fronts, depressions, etc. It's not rocket science... it's weather forecasting. It seems to me that you sort of need to know what the climate is doing at the time in order to make an accurate prediction for what the weather on the surface will be like.

The hurricane predictions aren't always on par, neither are any other predictions to be totally honest, but their wouldn't be any sort of guess at them at all if we didn't have the satellites in orbit to feed us on the ground the data.

I think the gov needs to get over itself, we need climate/weather data a lot more than we needed all those dysfunctional F22 raptors that got built for the war machine.. ._. .

How is that hope and change working for you? For every dollar that American Citizens invested in space exploration they got $10 back. Wanda Sykes thinks that a bad investment. She thinks that we got more out of investing in food stamps. She actually has people that watch her TV show. If Barack Hussein Obama (uhn-uhn-uhn) had spent the stimulus money on space exploration, the US would truely be in the middle of an economic recovery. Not some media generated faux recovery. Does anyone that believes in man made global warming understand that words mean things. There is "irrefutable" (look the word up) anthropolical evidence that the Earth has been in a "global" (not regional) trend for at least the last 6,000 years. Why don't you ask Wanda Sykes how many humans were alive on the planet 6,000 years ago. She might know how many cars they had. Maybe they had Chevy Volts. G-d you people are rocket scientist. Maybe you should just run for President with zero experience or qualifications.

"NPP will have a life span of about five years, at which point JPSS should be ready to replace it."

They're requesting $1.06 BILLION this year to replace something that hasn't launched and will only last 5 years? Is it any wonder our government has so much debt?

200M/yr isn't that much considering just how much data these weather/climate satellites actually give.

They're talking that Sandy could cause $1B+ in damage. Now assume we didn't have satellites telling us exactly where she will hit. Even a 20% increase in damage would be that $200M.

Weather/climate monitoring isn't just about the weather man on TV saying it's gonna rain. It's about real life and death decisions that are made based on the data we get from these satellites.

I'm sure the astronauts would email you pictures from orbit if you just asked.

Problem solved.


140 years of Popular Science at your fingertips.



Popular Science+ For iPad

Each issue has been completely reimagined for your iPad. See our amazing new vision for magazines that goes far beyond the printed page



Download Our App

Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone or Android phone with full articles, images and offline viewing



Follow Us On Twitter

Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed


February 2013: How To Build A Hero

Engineers are racing to build robots that can take the place of rescuers. That story, plus a city that storms can't break and how having fun could lead to breakthrough science.

Also! A leech detective, the solution to America's train-crash problems, the world's fastest baby carriage, and more.



Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email

Contributing Writers:
Clay Dillow | Email
Rebecca Boyle | Email
Colin Lecher | Email
Emily Elert | Email

Intern:
Shaunacy Ferro | Email

circ-top-header.gif
circ-cover.gif
bmxmag-ps