It seems we’re saying goodbye to a lot of spacecraft these days. The shuttle Discovery, of course, completed its final mission earlier this month. And then WISE, after completing it’s roughly one-year survey of the sky, snapped its final image last month. Now, NASA bids farewell to its Stardust spacecraft which, after more than a decade of service, has tailed its last comet.
At around 7 p.m. EST tonight, Stardust’s mission handlers plan to execute a final burn of the spacecraft’s thrusters, firing rocket motors that collectively have fired more than 2 million times since its launch in 1999. And when this burn is complete, Stardust--now completely out of fuel--will lose attitude control, turn its solar panels from the sun, and slip quietly into the great beyond.
But what eulogy would be complete without a quick spin through the highlight reel? Stardust is NASA’s most traveled comet chaser, logging billions of miles. Hurled into deep space in February, 1999, it passed an asteroid (known as Annefrank), rendezvoused with comet Wild 2, and returned particles from Wild 2 to Earth via a separate capsule in 2006 (notching 2.88 billion miles on the round trip).Still powering through space just fine, NASA sent Stardust out again, this time to comet Tempel 1 which it reached just last month (and sent us back a bunch of beautiful pics). But at this point, with another 646 million miles tallied, Stardust has to be getting low on fuel.
But just how low on fuel is it? Stardust’s mission handlers have an estimate, but there’s really no way to know--there does not yet exist a precise fuel gauge that works well on spacecraft like Stardust. So Stardust will literally be providing science right up to the very end. Handlers at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory will execute a “burn to depletion,” firing Stardust’s thrusters until its fuel is no more. Stardust will be downlinking information on the burn throughout, allowing scientists on the ground to figure out exactly how much fuel was left in the tanks. By comparing that to their estimates, they can better gauge the efficacy of their fuel consumption models.
It’s a fitting end for a spacecraft that executed no less than 40 major flight path maneuvers over the course of its deep space travels. Stardust’s final act will better inform the construction of and planning for future deep space missions like its own.
[NASA]
Five amazing, clean technologies that will set us free, in this month's energy-focused issue. Also: how to build a better bomb detector, the robotic toys that are raising your children, a human catapult, the world's smallest arcade, and much more.


Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email
Assistant Editor: Colin Lecher | Email
Assistant Editor: Rose Pastore | Email
Contributing Writers:
Rebecca Boyle | Email
Kelsey D. Atherton | Email
Francie Diep | Email
Shaunacy Ferro | Email
Goodbye, cruel world,
I'm leaving you today,
Goodbye, goodbye, goodbye...
Goodbye, all you people,
There's nothing you can say,
To make me change my mind,
Goodbye.
The Wall - Pink Floyd
I wish this article would explain exactly what powers Stardust. What is its energy source? What thrust is being pushed out? Ions or some other energy is its thrust. What is the source of its power?
This article comments much on the distance it traveled and its maneuvers. It gets me interested. These questions come to my mind and then it just ends. I can't really get excited about the technology, because the article tells me nothing about it. This article is a disappointment. I am not expecting the writer to give me schematics or blue prints of the space craft. I can only imagine this is private secret stuff. But, I am content with general information.
Here's some general information for you.
Quit nagging.
If you want the specs look them up somewhere else.
That's not what this article is offering.
BubbaGump: Go to stardust.jpl.nasa.gov/tech/misc.html to learn what you're asking.
i guess i will pile it on, popsci is not google, people need to quit griping about the lack of info in a small article online, buy the magazine, a quick google search should satisfy one's curiosity
I agree that popsci is not google, But, it would not have hurt to mention the type of engine -- since the article discusses that fuel gauges have yet to be developed.
....ride on a shooting star...
....one without a permanent scar....
....while your looking for yourself out there....
why cant they send it back towards earth with its last sip of fuel and have it reach us in a few years?
This was a triumph!
I'm making a note here:
"HUGE SUCCESS!!"
It's hard to overstate
my satisfaction
-GlaDOS