Last November, Mario Garcia was walking toward the backyard of the Escondido, California, home where he worked as a gardener when he stepped on what looked like white powder and heard a boom. The substance, it turned out, was hexamethylene triperoxide diamine (HMTD), a compound that reacts violently when exposed to heat and friction. Badly burned, Garcia was rushed to the hospital, and when the San Diego hazmat squad searched the house, they found one of the largest caches of homemade explosives in U.S. history, with several pounds of HMTD and grenades recovered, plus 25 gallons of sulfuric acid, nitric acid, and two guns.
A federal grand jury indicted the home’s tenant, 54-year-old George Djura Jakubec, on charges related to making destructive devices and robbing three banks. Meanwhile, a bomb squad detonated the explosives in his backyard but concluded that it was too risky to send technicians into the cluttered house, where clothing and dishes were stacked next to volatile chemicals. They also ruled out a robot, which could knock into a mess and trigger an explosion. The chemicals were so unstable that the safest solution—the bomb squad, hazmat team and FBI all agreed—was to burn the place to the ground.
Detonating or burning explosives produces the same gaseous admixture of carbon dioxide, water vapor and various nitrogen oxides. But burning releases the gases slowly, without dangerous force, and is thus a tried-and-true disposal technique for weaponry. After World War II, obsolete or unserviceable munitions were often set aflame in giant trenches. Following the 2003 U.S. invasion of Iraq, soldiers captured tons of bulk munitions dumped throughout the country, which Army Corps of Engineers contractors dispatched in open burns. At least 10 Army sites in the U.S. still burn old ammo in open pits.
In Escondido, firefighters built a 16-foot containment wall coated with fire-retardant gel, removed surrounding vegetation, and bored holes into the roof to allow more oxygen to reach the fire. More than 200 properties within a roughly 300-yard perimeter were readied for evacuation, and nearby Interstate 15 was scheduled for temporary closure. They waited until the weather was just right (clear skies, mild winds coming from the west toward the freeway) and, on the morning of December 9, a bomb unit placed black powder and wooden pallets inside the house. Then, ignition. The fire went according to plan—1,800°F and a plume of dark smoke that shot up about 2,000 feet. There were no major explosions, although onlookers heard some loud bangs from the grenades and ammo. The property owner’s attorney later demanded the county pay $500,000 for the damage.
More often than you might think, occasions arise where nothing solves an issue better than a hefty dose of good old-fashioned fire. Click to see our gallery of other situations when the best way to deal with a problem is just to burn it up.
Five amazing, clean technologies that will set us free, in this month's energy-focused issue. Also: how to build a better bomb detector, the robotic toys that are raising your children, a human catapult, the world's smallest arcade, and much more.


Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email
Assistant Editor: Colin Lecher | Email
Assistant Editor: Rose Pastore | Email
Contributing Writers:
Rebecca Boyle | Email
Kelsey D. Atherton | Email
Francie Diep | Email
Shaunacy Ferro | Email
I mainly like the very last sentence of the article. "The property owner’s attorney later demanded the county pay $500,000 for the damage". What does that tell you about people?
"the property owner's attorney later demanded the county pay $500,000 for the damage"? seriously? the property owner should be the one paying the money to the county!
The house was a rental so it's the tenant who's responsible for the care of the property. Somehow I don't think his security deposit is going to cover it. Since he's likely to be in jail for like, forever, good luck with going after the tenant. I'm thinking the owner should have done a better background check.
It will be interesting to see how this case goes. Is the county liable to the owner for something his tenant did? Personally I don't think so.
Bob
Forget the attorney, they guy would be charged for all of the lot, the guns, and the grenades. Plus if theres any connection between him and any gang or drug group, hes gone for life. Even he was a renter, the owner didnt ever think to go into the house every few months??? wtf mate. It just goes to show how blind we are to the people in front of us, generally thier good, but theres a few bad apples in the bunch!!
Man they burnt 134 tons of pot I wonder if it played out like that episode on the Simpsons. When the cops set fire to the marijuana, and all the reefers did was stand around the bond fire to get high lol.
My purpose in this world is knowledge and the dissemination of it, and it is I who is to restore the fruits of my labors to the entire world.
-Schwarzwald
2. One, "backyard" is an adjective, it is not a noun. He was walking in the back yard. Or, he was swimming int he backyard pool.
Two, it's a bonfire, not a "bond fire", which would be for burning bonds.
English, people, English.
@Observer - "...swimming [in the] backyard pool." - FIXED
RE: "bond fire" - You ever talk to a reefer? :)'Nuff said!
"A military band played, and then soldiers set the stash (which could have been turned into several hundred million joints) ablaze on a makeshift platform before a crowd."
That was definitely a pot party at least 10 miles in diameter. I guess that was mariachi music they were playing. I wonder how the people at ground zero are doing these days?
And how does wound cauterization fall into the category of "mass destruction." The writer of this article must have been in that pot party.
I heard a flock of seagulls flew through the smoke plume. There wasn't a tern unstoned.
All that weed NOoooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
Property owner is probably SOL. If you have rental property used for a meth lab, YOU are responsible for cleanup before it can be rented again -- and the cleanup can be very expensive.
As for the 134 tons -- Guiness wrote it up as the world's largest POT ROAST :)
The universal cue for all the readers to know you sound ridiculous is when you compare the amount of marijuana to "xx million joints." Makes you sound like you favour ill-informed scare-tactics propaganda.
that house could have the power to rocket all the way to the moon
Good kind of mass destruction!? Biggest lie ever. I cry when I see all that potential economy boosting product being destroyed all because of hypocritical laws. Good...burn all the Mary away as you continue to allow alcohol to ruin and kill thousands of lives on a monthly basis.