Automakers are already mass producing cars that will parallel park themselves, but the rudimentary sensor-based systems on the latest Lexus or Buick have nothing on Junior. The Stanford Racing Team's autonomous car can throw itself into reverse, jam the accelerator to the floor, and slam on the brakes at 25 miles per hour, sliding sideways into a parking space in a display that would make the Duke boys proud.
This maneuver, while exhilarating in the James Bond sense, is not just for fun. The team is trying to teach the car to think for itself. Junior usually uses a model of the car's dynamics to control steering, gas, and braking. This is relatively easy when the car is moving straight ahead, but when it's sliding sideways across the pavement, the variables -- friction of the tires, texture of the pavement, grade of the roadway -- are far more diverse. That means working from a fixed model is far more difficult.So the team also implemented a two-prong approach. There's the physics-based simulator that understands how the car moves in space, and a second system that draws from past demonstrations of the car sliding across the pavement. That second system works more or less by trial and error; it draws on the cars "experience," repeating the control inputs it used in other successful slide maneuvers to try to reproduce the successful results.
The trick was teaching Junior to employ both systems, and to learn when to switch between the two. Junior uses the physics based model to make its approach, then must switch to the demonstration-based model to throw the brakes and slide quite coolly into the parking space. The software must make the decision when to make that switch.
The car has a margin of error of about two feet, so don't expect Lexus to make it a standard feature any time soon. But from a machine learning standpoint, it's quite an impressive maneuver. If we can teach our machines to be more flexible, using a kind of learned intuition to switch between control models, developers should be able to create better autonomous robots that can handle not just preprogrammed tasks, but variables that arise out of the blue. That's not even factoring in their eligibility for style points.
[PhysOrg]
138 years of Popular Science at your fingertips.
Each issue has been completely reimagined for your iPad. See our amazing new vision for magazines that goes far beyond the printed page
Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone or Android phone with full articles, images and offline viewing
Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed
Science is reinventing play, from extreme sports to gamification to ridiculous roller coasters to the playgrounds of tomorrow, and this issue is chock full of fun. Also, on a less fun note: Did global warming destroy my hometown?
That. is. AWESOME!
Something tells me that the DMV would not let you use this on the driving test...
I think Night Rider's car could do this in the 80s.. Kidding. It seems to me that combining these two types of computing methods probably more closely resembles the way humans do these types of stunts. Intuition and experience, instead of trying to figure it out from scratch every time.
I noticed there is someone in the passenger seat on that last manoeuvre. That must have been a bizarre experience for him.
You're on your way to a nice restaurant with your wife. You see someone pulling out of a parking spot ahead of you. Wow! It's right there in front of the restaurant.
Suddenly, some mofo comes roaring up from the other direction, pulls a "Dukes of Hazzard" and, as the blue smoke settles, gives you a smile and the finger.
Sorry, dude. Find another spot.
Notice that the car is facing wrong way in the traffic lane, before spinning around into the parking spot. That could be a bit tough to set up in real traffic!!