The difficulty of supplying remote outposts across rugged terrain has contributed to many of the deadliest moments in the Afghan War, by preventing the delivery of weapons and ammo to engaged soldiers, forcing supplies to travel over dangerous roads, or turning helicopters into vulnerable targets. Last June, the Marines put out a call for a helicopter UAV to solve those problems. Now, with a successful demonstration at Utah's Dugway Proving Grounds, the Marines might have found their robocopter.
In the demonstration, a modified K-MAX helicopter moved 3,000 pounds across 600 miles, in under six hours. The K-MAX, built by Kamen Aerospace, is a single-seat helicopter designed specifically to carry cargo externally slung beneath the craft. For the Marines, Kamen simply removed the crew cabin, and transformed the helicopter into a UAV.
Even more impressive, the UAV performed the mission with almost no hands-on control. A ground operator only adjusted the flight path at the request of Marine observers who wanted to see what the chopper could do. Otherwise, the UAV flew the entire mission on programming.
Most importantly though, this program is both cheap and fast. At a cost of only $860,000 per UAV, and with the technology ready to hit the Afghan skies today, the Marines can get these birds in the air as quickly as possible. And for the grunts waiting for supplies, driving in those supplies across IED-laden paths, or flying them in through treacherous canyons, a robotic replacement can't arrive soon enough.
Five amazing, clean technologies that will set us free, in this month's energy-focused issue. Also: how to build a better bomb detector, the robotic toys that are raising your children, a human catapult, the world's smallest arcade, and much more.


Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email
Assistant Editor: Colin Lecher | Email
Assistant Editor: Rose Pastore | Email
Contributing Writers:
Rebecca Boyle | Email
Kelsey D. Atherton | Email
Francie Diep | Email
Shaunacy Ferro | Email
This is an exciting step forward for our soldiers in combat.
Although the K-MAX is an ugly chopper, it can certainly get the job done.
Fully fuel with no cargo it is only 2721 kg / 6000lb. With full external load it would weight 5216 kg / 12000lb. It can basically move it's own weight in cargo which is highly efficient.
Add to that the cargo is under-slung you have a very rapid deployment of the cargo as it can just be dropped and the chopper can be gone in a matter of seconds.
--GTO--
and why cant we make uav cars?
Hey first of UAV's aren't cars because UAV's are unmanned aerial vehicles a car isn't an unmanned aerial vehicle. Normal cars that is.
first sentance supposed to be "first of ALL"
I hope the KMAX can perform well at high altitudes. It's easy to lift things at sea level, but the air is pretty thin up in Afghanistan.
ding dnog...Skynet calling.
sorry...supposed to be "ding-dong". gotta learn to use the preview more.
trireme
Totally correct in your assessment. Most aircraft mishaps in Afghanistan is due to the high altitude of FOBs and the terrain in general. The thin air makes it especially difficult for rotary aircraft to fly. And al Qaeda tends to like those mountains, caverns and such because it puts us more on equal ground with them. We can't really take an Abrams or an IFV up into the mountains, so we gotta hoof it just like them.
It can carry 1500 lbs up to 12000 ft and hover. It did this at the demo!!!!
couldn't they have used the fire scout they just cancelled
Wonder is its radio,IR,or server controlled
unmanned ground vehicles (UGV) are being developed. but unmanned driving is a lot harder, because there is a lot more clutter to take into account (road holes, tree trunks, people, animals, traffic...) compared to flying (bad weather which is easy to avoid, birds and other aircraft which are rare and relatively easy to avoid)
undoubtedly high altitude operations are factored into the K-Max program. for example its competitor is the Boeing A160, which is known for its capacity to operate at high altitudes (and long endurance). the A160 carries less than the K-Max, but can fly longer and faster, an interesting trade off
the Fire Scout is not an option because it's a much lighter craft (half the weight and size I think)
personally I think they should get all three types: the Fire Scout for recon and light attack, A160 for surveillance/attack missions/covert operation/emergencies (wounded transport, crashed pilot retrieval) and the K-Max for transportation
and Skynet can't do much with these until it can maintain and arm them without human help. automated arming is on its way, but maintenance is many decades away