Six Europeans recently wrapped up 105 days in an isolation chamber with no TV, no showers, and lots of precooked food, to test the stresses of a journey to Mars. Real Marstronauts might not have to suffer through all that. A new ion engine, which shoots charged particles to create thrust, could get them to the Red Planet in just 39 days.
In theory, there’s no better way of getting between planets than an ion engine. The engine in NASA’s asteroid probe Dawn fires electrons at xenon gas to convert those atoms into positive ions, which fall onto a positively charged screen that repels the ions out of the engine.The problem is power. For example, Dawn runs on three ion engines, each of which puts out a steady, but measly, one third of an ounce of thrust. (Each engine on a Boeing 777 churns out about 100,000 pounds of thrust.) This is great for long, unmanned missions—it took 16 months to propel the probe to Mars—but it’s not ideal for humans looking to spend as little time in transit as possible. NASA is retooling its engine for triple the thrust, which could get a probe to Mars faster, but it’s still too slow for a large spaceship heavy with crew and gear. If a little more thrust is good, a lot more is better. The Texas-based aerospace company Ad Astra’s VASIMR engine creates a thicker ion stream by shooting radio waves, rather than electrons, at argon gas. Then, the engine’s superconducting magnets fling the ions to generate 50 times as much thrust.


Five amazing, clean technologies that will set us free, in this month's energy-focused issue. Also: how to build a better bomb detector, the robotic toys that are raising your children, a human catapult, the world's smallest arcade, and much more.


Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email
Assistant Editor: Colin Lecher | Email
Assistant Editor: Rose Pastore | Email
Contributing Writers:
Kelsey D. Atherton | Email
Francie Diep | Email
Shaunacy Ferro | Email
YES! I thought the idea of a nuclear powered space engine was dead in the water. I remember something about treaties preventing the use of nuclear devices in the atmosphere that hamstrung scientists looking for the biggest bang for the buck.
I am very pleased they are looking at this, hopefully they can implement it and it works out!
Now we have a place to bury all that nuclear waste... on mars.... this would provide one huge advantage though.
Imagine:
Nuclear powered ion engine gets us to mars in 39 days, then becomes the main reactor for the base station, and will last many years... and will power all sorts of electric vehicles to roam the surface. it will be almost necessary to provide all the power needed for "packing up camp" in case of a storm also.... and if there are enough of them, should be able to juice some magnetic fields for plasma shields to prevent all the marstronauts from dying of cancer... (watch the cold plasma torch video a few links back)