Last Friday the Obama campaign made a big move in courting the country’s nerds, geeks and overall science-friendly voters. First the campaign announced that 61 Nobel laureates in science signed a letter supporting Obama’s election, then the campaign unveiled a new science policy centered on increased funding and an emphasis on math and science education.
The policy expands on a less-detailed three page fact sheet posted to the Obama campaign website earlier in the year. The policy focuses on doubling the budget of the National Science Foundation, the National Institute of Health and other science oriented agencies over the next ten years, creating scholarships to augment the salaries of math and science teachers, and, of course, investing in green technologies.
The new Obama policy also pledges to “ensure independent, non-ideological, expert science and technology advisory committees.” That claim will be music to the ears of the 61 Nobel laureates supporting Obama, as their letter specifically mentions that, “During the administration of George W. Bush, vital parts of our country's scientific enterprise have been damaged by stagnant or declining federal support. The government's scientific advisory process has been distorted by political considerations.”
The endorsement letter, signed by such scientific luminaries as Don Glaser, inventor of the bubble chamber and James Watson, co-discoverer of the structure of DNA, goes on to say that “our once dominant position in the scientific world has been shaken and our prosperity has been placed at risk.”
Dire warnings aside, Obama’s focus on science is interesting in that it has yet to be matched by a similar emphasis from the McCain camp. While both candidates responded to the ScienceDebate 2008 questions with large-scale plans, only the Obama campaign has released a detailed policy outline. No doubt the McCain campaign will release a more in-depth policy paper shortly, though a release of Ron Paul or Ralph Nader’s plans remains unlikely.
Five amazing, clean technologies that will set us free, in this month's energy-focused issue. Also: how to build a better bomb detector, the robotic toys that are raising your children, a human catapult, the world's smallest arcade, and much more.


Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email
Assistant Editor: Colin Lecher | Email
Assistant Editor: Rose Pastore | Email
Contributing Writers:
Rebecca Boyle | Email
Kelsey D. Atherton | Email
Francie Diep | Email
Shaunacy Ferro | Email
I think Ron Paul is unlikely to release his policy paper because he is no longer running for office :-)
make that Sixty-one Nobel laureates and one multi-millionaire ppx player.
It seems that within the U.S there has been a inclined interest towards Obama but we should not avoid the heavy research backing of Mcain also.....
I guess for scientific luminaries, when the President questions the validity of controversial research it's "political." When the President limits taxpayer funding of research with serious moral implications, it's also "political." I can hardly wait for those luminaries to have their minds finally set at ease as scientists are freed from any questions about the validity or morality of taxpayer-funded research under a miraculously apolitical Obama presidency.
Oh, wait. I forgot that those luminaries are people too and they have questionable opinions that matter as much as mine, which is very little.
Obama will be the greatest president in U.S. history and will help all of us Nerds get great paying jobs in science.
Please. Obama just wants to spend taxpayer money. He wants bigger government, and he is sucking in the weak-minded with the lure of more money for whatever programs they might be interested in. In this case, science. Y'all might want to read up on all the other programs he plans to spend billions on. And when the money just isn't there, who is gonna get cut out first? Entitlements? Not so much. Health care? Guess again. "Luxury" programs like science and military will be the first to go.
I thought scientists were supposed to be smart. Where is all this extra money gonna come from? The rich? I think we're about to bail the rich out to the tune over half of a TRILLION dollars! These scientists may know a lot about science, but they need to take an economics course before they start endorsing candidates. Very sad.
I don't see the point in increasing federal support for science. This is a capitalist country. Everyone has different opinions about what is important. If you think that these programs are worth your hard-earned cash, then start a fundraiser for them. The fact is that when these programs are something that is worth while, they get funding from the private sector. I thinm that the following things are all that the federal government should have their noses in.
Military (you can't have a private military. That would basically be gang warfare.)
Helping the environment (at least until it becomes profitable to do so. then the free market can take over.)
Schooling (some eager kids wouldn't go to school if they felt they needed to aid their family more. Mandatory government funded schools give those kids a reason to attend.)
Keeping us from killing each other. (this is what you call a "law")
And VERY FEW other things.
The reason that there isn't as much emphasis on science today is not because of inaction or action on the government's part. We have one of the most divers nations in the world. We can't expect a large portion of our society to have the exact same interests. Besides, the culture as a whole frowns on the intellectual and smiles upon the jock. The real problem is the CULTURE. There basically two ways to get the public reinterested. One way is to start some sort of convoluted space race with China. ( it turns out that we had a working rocket and a functional sattelite before Russia. We just didn't fund the right technology. The purpose of the sattelite was to establish space as international territory and Russia did that for us.)
The second way to get the majority involved in education is to elect a grand honarable chairman to preside over the People's Republic of America