In what was no doubt the first ever 140-character legal document, the British High Court has served an anonymous web-pest an injunction via Twitter. This is the first time the microblogging service has been used to execute a court order.
The Court issued an injunction against an unknown Twitter member who used the name and likeness of a law firm owner (poor choice of victim) to spread conservative messages. The Court decided that the user had unlawfully impersonated the lawyer, one Donal Blaney, and that since the defendant was unknown, Twitter would be the best way to notify the criminal.
This case sets a profound precedent of how and when people can be served with legal documents. In the US, the law varies from state to state, with some states demanding that documents be hand-delivered by a process server, while others allow notification by mail. In the US, no one has thus far been served with any legal document through blogs or Twitter.
[via Reuters]
Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing
Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed
Share links with friends, comment on stories and more
In our December issue, Popular Science names the 100 best innovations of the year: bombproof wallpaper, self-parking cars, the fastest helicopter, and 97 more. Plus inventor profiles and videos.
Check out the best of what's new here.
I wonder how much legal precedent is really being set here.
"since the defendant was unknown" So they broadcast a message to someone saying, what -- knock it off, or we'll figure out who you are and punish you accordingly!
I always thought that you had to know who the lawbreaker was before you could pass judgement.