By Clay Dillow Posted 09.25.2009 at 7:17 am 9 Comments

Carbonated Crops Researchers found that introducing carbon nanotubes to tomato seeds resulted in increased germination rates and stronger seedlings. On the left, the control group; on the right, tomato seedlings exposed to carbon nanotubes. via ACS Nano

Carbon nanotubes have improved existing technologies in fields ranging from electrical circuitry to architecture to materials science. So is it any surprise that when researchers in Arkansas applied the miraculous microscopic structures to tomato seeds, the plants grew faster, stronger, and more plentifully?

The nano-enhanced seeds experienced an increase in germination percentage and better seedling growth, likely due to increased water absorption. Though findings are preliminary, the seeds exposed to nanotubes contained more moisture, which appears to be the catalyst behind their enhanced growth.

Related Articles

Carbon Nanotubes May Present a Cancer Risk
Better Tomatoes Via a Fertilizer of...Human Urine?
China Reports the First Human Nano-Fatalities

Tags

Science, Clay Dillow, agriculture, biofuel, biomass, carbon nanotubes, fertilizer, nanotech, nanotechnology
On its face, the discovery means carbon nanotubes could potentially unlock a new breed of fertilizers that spur growth in food crops without introducing chemicals to soil and nearby water supplies. Moreover, enhanced growth means enhanced biomass, which could spell big implications for the biofuel arena.

But increased food supply and better biomass doesn’t come without its drawbacks. The effects of nanotubes on the environment aren’t very well documented. Specifically, the way they might move through the food chain could pose problems down the road. Some single-walled nanotubes are toxic to some insects; testing on mice has found multi-layer nanotubes (like the kind used in the study) have carcinogenic effects similar to those of asbestos. Suffice it to say, the golden age of carbon nanotube farming isn’t upon us just yet, but the potential is there, and not just for bigger tomatoes.

[Technology Review]

Want to learn more about breakthroughs in electronics, medicine, nanotech, and more?
Subscribe to Popular Science today, for less than $1 per issue!

9 Comments

Link to this comment
meyaht
09/25/09 at 9:09 am

it would be nice to see this used in tree farming, assuming you could somehow stop the wildlife from living near or eating parts of the trees.

Link to this comment
caradoc01
09/25/09 at 12:01 pm

Yeah that nasty wildlife, how dare they try to eat their food when we are trying to use it for wood, fuel and clearing because it is in the way of a farmers plow.

Link to this comment
animemaster
09/25/09 at 3:14 pm

Did they try a non nanotube form of carbon to compare with? Perhaps ground up activated charcoal.

Link to this comment
extremechiton
09/25/09 at 7:05 pm

we can use this to combat desertification and turn a desert into a gigantic farm.
increase food production, therefore food prices will drop.

Link to this comment
deegeezee
09/26/09 at 9:23 pm

extremechiton, nanotubes won't conjure water where it doesn't already exist.
-----
and i'll take my produce "possible-asbestosis" free, thanks.

Link to this comment
luke123abc
09/27/09 at 12:09 pm

i agree with animemaster, they should try to see if its any improvement over other carbon forms. its a fairly well known fact that charcoal, when put into the ground stops nutrient leaching and increases the amount of water that can be held in the ground. not to mention charcoal is a lot less labor intensive to produce than nanotubes.

Link to this comment
NOM
09/28/09 at 3:47 pm

What is in the control? It's not soil, so adding anything would probably have had a positive effect.

Link to this comment
freewaffles
10/08/09 at 8:13 pm

to luke123abc and animemaster,
I'm sure someone has tried just putting charcoal into the ground, so if that was a miracle growth substance, it would probably be in use already. If this could be used in tree farming to, say, make them grow considerably faster, the teak business, for instance, could be hugely impacted.

Link to this comment
bejam1n
03/03/11 at 2:51 pm

With the prices of CNTs ranging from $50-$300 a gram I am sure they will make a excellent fertilizer.


138 years of Popular Science at your fingertips.

Innovation Challenges

Make your ideas part of the revolution
Learn morePowered by Innocentive



Popular Science+ For iPad

Each issue has been completely reimagined for your iPad. See our amazing new vision for magazines that goes far beyond the printed page



Download Our App

Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone or Android phone with full articles, images and offline viewing



Follow Us On Twitter

Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed


February 2012: The Future of Fun

Science is reinventing play, from extreme sports to gamification to ridiculous roller coasters to the playgrounds of tomorrow, and this issue is chock full of fun. Also, on a less fun note: Did global warming destroy my hometown?


circ-top-header.gif
circ-cover.gif