The Breakdown

Now that looks like fun. Of course we intuitively know it's completely fake, and involves the usual videographic sleight of hand, but let's apply some basic physics to the situation to check our intuition.

First of all, the "diver," after being launched off the ramp, travels a horizontal distance of at least 50 meters before landing in the pool. Assuming a 45-degree launch angle, which gives us the maximum trajectory if we neglect air resistance (air resistance will only make matters worse), let's calculate the absolute minimum speed we need to leave the ramp to stick the landing. What we have here is a good old-fashioned projectile!

Our projectile (again neglecting air friction) will have a constant velocity in the horizontal direction. Thus we get a horizontal motion equation as follows:

Δx = v0 cos (45) t

where Δx is the horizontal distance of 50 meters, v0 is the launch velocity, and t is the time of flight.

In the vertical acceleration we have a constant downward acceleration due to gravity of g = 9.8 m/s2. Assuming we are launched from approximately the same height where we land, we get

Δy = 0 = v0 sin (45) t + ½ at2

Combining the two equations, doing a little algebra, and solving for v0 we find that

v0 = 22 m/s or about 50 miles per hour!

Now, are we to believe that the diver is able to get up to such a speed by sliding down that slip-and-slide? Not likely. Being extremely generous by neglecting the very non-negligible force of friction (yes, even on a slip-and-slide), estimating that the diver is at most maybe 10 meters higher than his launch point, then using conservation of energy, we can calculate the maximum possible speed he would have on takeoff. This is going to be a severe overestimate, due to our neglecting friction, but let's see what we get.

According to conservation of energy, we know that the potential energy (mgΔh) that he loses due to the height difference between the start and the launch point will be converted to kinetic energy (½ mv2).

mgΔh = ½ mv2

where v is his launch velocity. We get v = 14 m/s (around 30 miles per hour).

The physics don't lie. It canna' be done, Cap'n!

Adam Weiner is the author of Don't Try This at Home! The Physics of Hollywood Movies.

Want to learn more about breakthroughs in electronics, medicine, nanotech, and more?
Subscribe to Popular Science today, for less than $1 per issue!

7 Comments

extremely interesting article
but
whats the point of it?

The point is to give you interesting reading material if you want more depth of information then buy a textbook. Whats the point of reading about flying cars and incomprehensible quantum physics if not solely to spark a deeper interest in science, thats how half the people who read this website went on to become an engineer, biologist, astronomer etc.

I estimate he was in the air about 2.5s. That means, given all the assumptions made above, that he could have got about 25 meters. Maybe it's just the camera making it look further?

burgerga123

from puyallup, wa

Let's not forget the fact that he would decelerate from that 50 mph, (or 30 if it was actually real) in only 2 or 3 feet of water. Those kinds of forces would destroy your body.

Careful Ian1108, he's a fan enough to put apocalypse in his name so he's either completely ignorant or completely arrogant, and from the sounds of it I actually think he's both. Very interesting article ;-)

...Anyone else notice the water splash isn't significant enough for that speed at that angle? I have jumped into pools doing a cannon ball with more splash not going anywhere near that speed.

Here is the source of the video

www.mach-es-machbar.de/english/das-projekt-megawoosh.php5


138 years of Popular Science at your fingertips.

Innovation Challenges



Popular Science+ For iPad

Each issue has been completely reimagined for your iPad. See our amazing new vision for magazines that goes far beyond the printed page



Download Our App

Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone or Android phone with full articles, images and offline viewing



Follow Us On Twitter

Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed


February 2012: The Future of Fun

Science is reinventing play, from extreme sports to gamification to ridiculous roller coasters to the playgrounds of tomorrow, and this issue is chock full of fun. Also, on a less fun note: Did global warming destroy my hometown?


circ-top-header.gif
circ-cover.gif
bmxmag-ps