Scientists develop a new type of ink that goes on as a single color but can be turned into a full-color image in seconds

M-Ink via New Scientist

Traditional color printing -- whether done with an inkjet, laser or silkscreen -- requires a page to be laid out with several different inks in various colors to produce a full color image. But Korean engineers have developed a different process using a single nanoparticle-imbued ink, which could produce color prints in fractions of a second.

The new ink, called M-Ink by its developers, creates colors by changing its physical structure rather than by having a unique pigment. Like many colors in the natural world (the iridescence of a butterfly's wing, for example) the same M-Ink can appear as different colors depending on the way light reflects off of its structural patterns. Magnetic nanoparticles in the ink can be manipulated to arrange themselves in different ways, instantly creating any color in the visual spectrum.

In the ink, particles 100 to 200 nanometers wide are suspended in a resin. When a magnet is applied, the particles snap into place in chain-like structures. Changing the magnetic field strength changes the color reflected by the ink.

Exposed to UV light, the resin hardens and the particles are locked into the pattern of a particular color. By using a technique called maskless lithography, where a narrow beam is directed over only one part of the ink, it is possible to expose some of the image in a single color and then adjust the magnet to add another shade, and another, to create a full-color image.

The prototype system takes a few seconds to print a letter-sized color image. But the researchers report that it should be possible to make the system work in less than a second.

[New Scientist]

Want to learn more about breakthroughs in electronics, medicine, nanotech, and more?
Subscribe to Popular Science and enter to win $5,000!

2 Comments

Yeah, but will ink cartridges still cost $80 while the printers are literally given away? Or will it now be like $120 for ink?

It most likely wont be printed with "ink" that you would have to buy seperately, Most likely it would be on the paper already, then the paper would be charged through a printer that doesn't really print, but aligns the particles to make the image. My only thought is that anything with a magnet could ruin the image. So many many every day items could ruin it.



Download Our iPhone App

Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing



Follow Us On Twitter

Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed



Become a Fan On Facebook

Share links with friends, comment on stories and more


December 2009: Best of What's New

In our December issue, Popular Science names the 100 best innovations of the year: bombproof wallpaper, self-parking cars, the fastest helicopter, and 97 more. Plus inventor profiles and videos.

Check out the best of what's new here.

Popular Science Photo Pool


Share your photos in the Pop Sci pool at www.flickr.com!
tags_sprite.png
POP_embeddedForm_cover_May09.jpg