Overthrow the establishment using empirically-derived strategies

Mathematical Model for Revolutions Arvix

Researchers at the University of Cambridge have come up with a model for overtaking the majority leadership in any competitive field. But instead of studying psychology or sociology to derive his conclusion, Hai-Tao Zhang has used a model based entirely from physics.

The conclusion is fairly simple: that to best achieve a shift in leadership, the "revolutionary" faction must distribute its leaders in such a way to gain the most followers over the shortest amount of time. Whether it be in politics, business or other aspects of society, Zhang and his colleagues see their model as a universal theorem--a recipe, if you will, for grassroots efforts to have a chance against the machine.

The interesting part is that it's all based on physical models that govern individual entities' behavior in relation to a larger group (called flocking), the specifics of which are, I'm not afraid to admit, well above my head. But one researcher's work that serves as a foundational basis for Zhang's and co.'s model concerns something most people are in fact familiar with: the wave, as seen in a sports stadium.

The basis is a 2002 study by physicist Tomas Vicsek, where he developed a model for wave motion by watching fans in Mexican soccer stadiums. He realized it only took a few dozen fans to get everyone else going, and if they were efficiently distributed, then from there the wave would roll along.

I'm relieved to know that, thanks to research of this kind, some aspect of something as simple as joining in a drunken wave in the outfield can be expressed with a graph like this:

Figure 5: I always knew "the wave" answered to a higher concept  Zhang et al.

[Arxiv.org Paper via MIT Tech Review]

Want to learn more about breakthroughs in electronics, medicine, nanotech, and more?
Subscribe to Popular Science and enter to win $5,000!

2 Comments

This makes a Revolution sound so easy, I don't think this takes into account the impact of a rifle butt onto a human head or does it factor a blood stained street into it's model.

actually i think it does take into account the impact of a rifle butt onto a human head and blood stained street into the model. such factors if considered as a negative input into the model would in turn attract a "positive input" thereby negating the effect of the initiated negative input (the rifle butt onto a human head) keeping the integrity of the above model.



Download Our iPhone App

Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing



Follow Us On Twitter

Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed



Become a Fan On Facebook

Share links with friends, comment on stories and more


December 2009: Best of What's New

In our December issue, Popular Science names the 100 best innovations of the year: bombproof wallpaper, self-parking cars, the fastest helicopter, and 97 more. Plus inventor profiles and videos.

Check out the best of what's new here.

Popular Science Photo Pool


Share your photos in the Pop Sci pool at www.flickr.com!
tags_sprite.png
POP_embeddedForm_cover_May09.jpg