Overeating makes you overweight. I'll pause for a moment to let this mind-blowing scientific finding sink in.
In the annals of Science Confirms the Obvious, there's rarely a zinger like this one. And it's no surprise that the media's had a field day, churning out Onion-esque headlines like, well, the one above.
According to the research presented at last week's European Congress of Obesity, our meteoric weight gain of 19 pounds per adult capita between the 1970s and today is due only to increased caloric intake. Americans, it turns out, are no lazier than we were (in fact, we may be even more physically fit now than then).
As the lead researcher, Boyd Swinburn of Australia's Deakin University, put it: "the weight gain in the American population seems to be virtually all explained by eating more calories. It appears that changes in physical activity played a minimal role."
To figure out the winner in glutton vs. sloth, the team developed a simple equation with somewhat complex components. First, they measured the energy expenditure of 1,399 adults and 963 children to determine how many calories we need (presumably, not taking into account their desperate "need" for a caffeinated Butterfinger). Then, they culled data from decades' worth of food supply data to figure out how many calories we consumed in the 1970s and how many we choke down nowadays. If we consumed the same number of calories now as back in the day, our weight gain would have to be pinned on changes in physical activity (or, um, anything from changes in environment to food pricing; something the study seemed loath to take into account). Since we do consume more calories, however, it's pretty clear that food is the cause of our weight gain. Or, at the very least, that there is a correlation between the two.
Like most SCtO studies, it's worth taking the findings with a grain of salt. When I asked Swinburn whether it was possible that changes in the substance of diet (consuming more highly-processed foods, for instance), or external environmental factors could be blamed, he agreed that while "the most proximal cause is related to the energy we eat and/or the exercise we do...the causes of the causes are then much more complex and include the things you mention." Still, whether there's more at play (doubtless there is), is basically a moot point -- the study may be obvious but the lesson's worth the pounding in. Cut back on this!Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing
Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed
Share links with friends, comment on stories and more
In our December issue, Popular Science names the 100 best innovations of the year: bombproof wallpaper, self-parking cars, the fastest helicopter, and 97 more. Plus inventor profiles and videos.
Check out the best of what's new here.
I don't agree that it's purely an increase in consumed calories that's causing weight gain. They can try to claim all they want that activity levels are still the same as they were 30 years ago, but my own experience and the experience of my friends and family says otherwise.
Also, the move away from healthier, fat-containing foods to those that replace the removed calories with sugar is enough to alter the levels of hormones like testosterone and insulin, which are major players in body composition. Seriously, if you opt for low-fat ice cream instead of regular, you really aren't doing yourself any favours.
Is this really true? Fat people get fat by eating a lot? My god you guys really got some smart people working there!!!
No really... I always thought being fat was genetic... =P
I guess some people won't believe it unless they get the facts... Or will they?
Angie Walsh
MMMMMM cheese burger MMMMMM *drools on shirt*