Transoceanic freighters haul 80 percent of the world’s commercial goods. But those boats inadvertently carry destructive cargo as well. An empty ship can suck up more than 10 million gallons of water to stay balanced as it crosses the open ocean. Upon its arrival into another port, the crew pumps the ballast water and any small animals or plants living in that water—sometimes thousands of organisms per gallon—into foreign harbors, where they invade and damage local ecosystems. “We estimate, conservatively, that there are at least 5,000 species moving around the world daily in ships’ ballast water,” says James Carlton, a marine ecologist at Williams College.
Now, Dorin Boldor, a bioengineer at Louisiana State University’s Agricultural Center, is devising a high-powered microwave that nukes aquatic hitchhikers before they’re flushed out. Adapted from a microwave technology traditionally used to pasteurize sweet potatoes, the system purifies the ballast water for as little as one dollar per 250 gallons of water, less costly than other treatments like scrubbing ship hulls and spraying pesticides.
Foreign marine species, from bivalves to fish, have taken hold across the U.S. Over the past 150 years, 300 alien species have dramatically altered the biodiversity of San Francisco Bay. In the Chesapeake Bay, millions of snails from Japan prey on the region’s shellfish. And in the Great Lakes, the long tails of spiny water fleas, originally from Northern Europe, tangle fishing lines. America spends more than $1 billion a year trying to control such invasions both in the sea and on land. Still, hundreds of invasive species survive to flourish in their new homes.
Pending additional funding from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and approval from the Coast Guard, Boldor says shipping contractors could be zapping critters within a year.
Launch our gallery to see the worst invasive species. And turn the page to see how ships will be able to nuke marine organisms.
single pageFive amazing, clean technologies that will set us free, in this month's energy-focused issue. Also: how to build a better bomb detector, the robotic toys that are raising your children, a human catapult, the world's smallest arcade, and much more.


Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email
Assistant Editor: Colin Lecher | Email
Assistant Editor: Rose Pastore | Email
Contributing Writers:
Kelsey D. Atherton | Email
Francie Diep | Email
Shaunacy Ferro | Email
Fascinating indeed. Seems this should have been thought up a long time ago.
JT
www.Ultimate-Anonymity.com
This sounds like a good concept.
Ishan
www.dealguide.blogspot.com
I agree with AmberFox because we should have already thought of this. But then you have to look on the scientist's side because they are the ones who are making these things. We just have to give them more time to improve upon their findings.
$40,000 to clean the water of a ship one time. Not including the money spent putting this equipment in... Before the media picked up on the subject and started talking about the damage done, what was the purpose of these companies to spend that money? It's probably not that it didn't exist, just no reason for them to pay that kind of money to install and use it. As well as not giving us the inspiration to talk about it at all.
PopSci should try for an article about the serious test and development work that's been done in the new field of ballast water treatment, applying land-based systems such as chlorination and UV radiation. The microwave treatment alternative fell by the wayside some years ago due to the enormous energy and cost requirements, and the ancillary matter of the impact of discharging tens of thousands of tons of hot ballast water into port/coastal waters.
The article states that treatment will cost $1/ton (250 gallons). This is exorbitant when you consider that ballast loads on tankers and bulk carriers (ore, coal, etc.) are commonly above 100,000 tons. Technology developers are aiming at treatment costs of pennies per ton, including all system life cycle costs.