Add another study to the growing body of evidence that red-light cameras cause more accidents than they prevent. University of South Florida researchers found drivers are more likely to attempt to stop abruptly at camera intersections than otherwise, which results in a significant increase in injuries from rear end collisions. Red-light cameras are designed to snap a photo of a car’s license plate if the driver moves through the intersection under a red light. The theory should hold that if drivers know they’re being watched, they’ll be less likely to run the lights.
As it turns out, the University of South Florida study shows that drivers were already being more cautious without the cameras, noting “the injury rate from red-light running crashes has dropped by a third in less than a decade.” What’s worse, the cameras are often coupled with a disruption of the yellow light timing, making the caution signal shorter than normal to increase the number of tickets generated. That’s a benefit to the municipality and a benefit to the insurance companies, who are able to raise premiums with crashes and citations, but no benefit to drivers.
The report also noted that much of the research bolstering the efficacy of red-light cameras was flawed, either with incomplete data or poor research design.
Via The Agitator
The incredible innovations, like drone swarms and perpetual flight, bringing aviation into the world of tomorrow. Plus: today's greatest sci-fi writers predict the future, the science behind the summer's biggest blockbusters, a Doctor Who-themed DIY 'bot, the organs you can do without, and much more.


Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email
Assistant Editor: Colin Lecher | Email
Assistant Editor: Rose Pastore | Email
Contributing Writers:
Kelsey D. Atherton | Email
Francie Diep | Email
Shaunacy Ferro | Email
Thank you for using my photo "Quis custodiet custodes ipsos?"—it makes me proud to be a Creative Commons photographer.
Ben Ostrowsky (sylvar)
Awesome man. Long live CC.
I am amazed anyone who does any research would quote the South Florida "study." There was no study, just a biased rehash of old anti-camera data. The person who wrote it was hired to do so, and the piece was debunked by the University. Camera safety results have been confirmed by multiple governmental agencies, copious studies the author chose to ignore. The same article the "study" reports as negative, also confirms a 40% drop in injury accidents. If you don't like the cameras, the answer is simple, don't run red lights... teach the city a lesson!
That picture is of a detection camera, not a red-light camera.
Also, a study by the Texas DOT showed that longer yellow lights alone reduce red-light running by upwards of 40%. This point is further proven by the fact that most red light camera tickets are given when the light has been red for less than one second. These infractions do not cause collisions as there is an all red period.
Red-light cameras are only necessary at over-saturated intersections where drivers purposely run red lights to avoid stopping for another cycle.