New research shows where deadly pathogens are cropping up the fastest. Unfortunately, the hottest hot zones often have the least funding to monitor for emerging diseases

map of emerging disease hotspots A map of the frequency that pathogens are passed from wildlife to humans. Green is lowest occurance; red is highest. Nature

As if I'm not paranoid enough about contracting some germ-based doom from riding the subway everyday, now scientists have presented, in this week's issue of Nature, the first map of emerging infectious disease hotspots throughout the world. And, yep, New York City seems to be in the red.

Emerging infectious diseases can be defined as either a newly discovered pathogen, or a known pathogen that has moved into a new area or region. Famous examples of exotic emerging diseases are ebola and SARS, but not all emerging diseases are new to science. Drug-resistant strains of various garden-variety pathogens (like Staphlococcus or tuberculosis) are also cropping up with increasing frequency. Often these pathogens originate in animal hosts before jumping species and tearing their way through the human population.

When researchers in the U.S. and the UK set out to map the hotspots they looked for both the exotic and the mundane. They also took into account the relative lack of monitoring and reporting of disease outbreaks in underdeveloped nations to give a clearer idea of where, and how often, diseases were making the jump from wildlife to humans. In the end, they discovered that emerging infections in developing nations tended to be novel pathogens, encountered as humans squeeze further into previously uninhabited regions and have more contact with the wildlife found there. Conversely, the emerging infections in the developed world were primarily drug-resistant pathogens, bred by widespread antibiotic use in the human and livestock populations. Additionally, the majority of the hotspots were found in the developing world. Unfortunately, most of the funding for monitoring and prevention is allocated to the developed world.

The upshot? Without better monitoring in the areas most likely to spawn a killer pathogen, the next big global threat could be floating around in airplane cabins before scientists even know it exists.

Still, I think I need to buy some more Purell.

Want to learn more about breakthroughs in electronics, medicine, nanotech, and more?
Subscribe to Popular Science today, for less than $1 per issue!

1 Comment

A lot of practices are considerd unorthodox or controversial by conventional medicine; but this doesn't neccessarily mean that they are wrong. Consuming megadoses of vitamin C can lead to diarrhea, but countries can't decide on a worldwide standard daily dose. Smokers need more, as do pregnant women and people under stress. Linus Pauling recommended 400 milligrams per day, but personally took between 6 and 18 thousand milligrams daily and lived to the ripe age of 93. Other notable professors recommend a twice daily dose of 500mg's (1000mg's). You should be able to tollerate 2000mg's a day for the length of a cold.

Personally, in addition to extra Vitamin C I take additional Vitamin D, stay well hydrated, frequently wash my hands with hot soap and water, and avoid touching my faces, eyes, and mouth.



June 2013: American Energy Independence

Five amazing, clean technologies that will set us free, in this month's energy-focused issue. Also: how to build a better bomb detector, the robotic toys that are raising your children, a human catapult, the world's smallest arcade, and much more.


Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email
Assistant Editor: Colin Lecher | Email
Assistant Editor: Rose Pastore | Email

Contributing Writers:
Rebecca Boyle | Email
Kelsey D. Atherton | Email
Francie Diep | Email
Shaunacy Ferro | Email

circ-top-header.gif
circ-cover.gif