The RedOwl is a robotic head that looks more like a PowerPoint projector than a sharpshooter's worst enemy. But don't let its Circuit City appearance fool you: Controlled by a laptop-wielding soldier, the RedOwl's superior senses can read a nametag from across a football field and identify the make and model of a rifle fired a mile away simply by analyzing the sound of the distant blast. And soon it could be putting its powers to use in Iraq.
RedOwl's developer, Glenn Thoren, now a director at Insight Technology in Londonderry, New Hampshire, says several prototypes have finished an intensive 10-week field test at Fort Benning in Georgia. Given the defense department's budget approval early this year, he hopes the $150,000 sniper-finders will be in Iraq by this spring.
The robot's mechanical ears were originally designed to improve hearing aides. But Thoren, then with Boston University's Photonics Center, which heads the RedOwl project, thought up a new application after learning of a spike in sniper activity surrounding Iraqi hotspots like Abu Ghraib prison. He combined the original listening system-which processes sound received by four microphones to determine the direction and elevation of a noise-with a suite of sensors, spotlights and a laser rangefinder. When the RedOwl hears gunfire, it swivels its head toward the source of the noise. A thermal imager can pick out the sniper while an infrared spotlight illuminates him for night-vision-equipped troops.
Attached to a PackBot, a miniature robot tank built by iRobot in Burlington, Massachusetts, and steered by a modified Xbox videogame controller, the RedOwl can also enter dangerous buildings in advance of soldiers. "Were hoping to put the robot in situations where it would be less safe for a soldier," Thoren says.
HOW IT WORKS
EARS
When a shot is fired, the incoming sound waves pass over four microphones, and a processor parses the data to pinpoint the source of the sound, all in a few milliseconds. The system can recognize weapons by their report, and thus ignore friendly fire.
EYES
A central camera allows the remote operator to see where the RedOwl is going, and a powerful zoom cam enables the operator to study potential snipers without getting too close. RedOwl´s lasers can illuminate a target up to a mile away. Because the laser is infrared, the sniper won´t be aware he´s in the spotlight, but soldiers with night-vision goggles will see him perfectly.
MATH SKILLS
A laser rangefinder bounces a beam off the target, and RedOwl calculates the intervening distance. Factoring in its own GPS position and using a magnetic compass to determine the direction in which it´s looking, RedOwl can figure out the location of a target 3,000 feet away, allowing troops to call in a precision air strike.
Five amazing, clean technologies that will set us free, in this month's energy-focused issue. Also: how to build a better bomb detector, the robotic toys that are raising your children, a human catapult, the world's smallest arcade, and much more.


Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email
Assistant Editor: Colin Lecher | Email
Assistant Editor: Rose Pastore | Email
Contributing Writers:
Kelsey D. Atherton | Email
Francie Diep | Email
Shaunacy Ferro | Email
We already have sniper interdiction systems in use. The sensors and guns on our tanks can be programmed to autofire on anything that moves, is a heat signature, or makes noise. We have had it in place since the tank was the X-1-A, and being proven in Europe. We have the specifically designed sniper location system that uses some of the tech this Red Owl uses. Not knowing how portable all of the requisite gear involved is, or how durable/cost-effective, The Red Owl might be an advance, or just wasting money on things that work well now. I know how hot and bothered the Army is for the tech revamp, but I would like to say something before we all get too drawn in by our shiny toys. The more hi tech we show off, the more effective low tech is gonna get. We know this from experience. The more we depend on these wonder gadgets, the less we depend on hard won combat lessons and human awareness. The Chinese, for one, can duplicate most of our tech before we can get it from prototype to production. And they are. Our Army physical combat training, while much advanced in the past few cycles, is still no match for the Special Ops training of 10 years ago.(with the possible exception of Corps) Still, even it is no match for modern "quick kill" tactics used by our elite. Also, the Marine Corps do not field the numbers we could easily find ourselves facing, and this tech can likely be countered Very Cheaply.(a handful of laser pointers aimed at operators eyes, and a bunch of wireless speakers blaring Armed Forces Radio come to mind.) Could someone please explain why we would want to spend 250,000 on a system to tell us where the shot came from, after the C.O. is dead; when a few trained dogs could eliminate the threat, or expose it before the C.O. has to die? Or is the dead officer "factored in"?
By the way.....If creative and patriotic Americans that are too old for service want to give an idea or two to our government without putting it out here for the PLANET, what are we to do? Our government seems not to want anyone's input anymore.
* How does is handle complex/craggy canyons and paking garages, etc. ?
* Can it be duped by acoustic simulators ?
* What about non-standard loads and barrel lengths ?
* Who's to say the enemy is not using a "friendly make/model" rifle ?
* What about supressed and silened rifles and custom rigs?