U.S. cloning expert Martin Pera on the Korean cloning scandal, self-correcting science and the importance of sound PR

stemcells.jpg

This January, news that South Korean scientist Hwang Woo Suk fabricated research on cloned human stem cells brought more negative attention to an already controversial field. Hwang´s work had been believed to be a breakthrough. His technique for cloning embryonic stem cells genetically matched to patients might have been used by scientists worldwide to cure disease. We spoke with Martin Pera, the head of the new Institute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine at the University of Southern California, to get an insider´s perspective on the scandal and its potential effects on future research.

PopSci: Just how important was Hwang´s work?

Martin Pera: To me it wasn´t that surprising. It´s not as if these people were playing in cold fusion or something.

PS: So how soon will it actually happen?

MP: I think someone will do it within the next couple years.

PS: The new center at USC will focus on the therapeutic uses of stem cells. When do you think we´ll start seeing results in that area? A decade? Two?

MP: It´s not possible to predict with certainty, but I think it will be sooner than that. I might expect some small-scale trials in certain conditions within the next five years.

PS: Do you think you´ll be watched more closely now because of the Hwang scandal?

MP: We have to be very, very careful. We entered into what I call a social contract. We as scientists said to the public, OK, we recognize there are ethical concerns in this area, but the potential benefits are so great that you really need to let us go forward. As a consequence of that, we need to give the public very strong reassurances that the work is being conducted in an ethical fashion.

PS: Does this extra attention impede your progress at all?

MP: Although I spend a lot more time now in PR and ethics and politics, I think we have to do that because the outcomes are going to be that much more significant. It wouldn´t have this spotlight on it if there weren´t such a potentially big benefit.

PS: Hwang´s fraud was discovered because his co-authors came forward. What if no one comes out? How do we prevent this from happening again?

MP: These things are going to happen. The good thing about science is that it is self-correcting. People go out and try to reproduce [the result], and if it doesn´t happen, then the work gradually fades into obscurity.

Want to learn more about breakthroughs in electronics, medicine, nanotech, and more?
Subscribe to Popular Science and enter to win $5,000!

0 Comments



Download Our iPhone App

Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing



Follow Us On Twitter

Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed



Become a Fan On Facebook

Share links with friends, comment on stories and more


December 2009: Best of What's New

In our December issue, Popular Science names the 100 best innovations of the year: bombproof wallpaper, self-parking cars, the fastest helicopter, and 97 more. Plus inventor profiles and videos.

Check out the best of what's new here.

Popular Science Photo Pool


Share your photos in the Pop Sci pool at www.flickr.com!
tags_sprite.png
POP_embeddedForm_cover_May09.jpg