By the late 1920s, the scientific community embraced Charles Darwin's theory of evolution as fact. Although much of the public had warmed up to his ideas, it had yet to achieve national acceptance, as evidenced by the Scopes trial that would occur two years after this article's publication. To educate our readers on the origin of species, we published Dr. E.E. Free's serial "The Story of Man and His World."
The fourth article in the series, pictured left, explained how primitive beings evolved into modern-day mankind. "Man was not created suddenly out of nothing either in Eden or elsewhere nor on any definite date," Free wrote, so where did he originate? While examining our ancestry, where do we draw the line between animal and human? Free explained that 70 to 80 million years ago, catlike creatures skipped about in the North Pole before migrating down to North America, and then to Central America, where they evolved into lemurs. Eventually, the lemur-monkeys moved down to Asia, where they grew stronger, moved from the trees to the ground, and became ape-like half-walkers, which in turn evolved to an a "man-ape" called Pithecanthropus erectus (homo erectus erectus), also known as Java Man. Need proof? Examine your own body and note the similarity of its structure to the make of a primate's, Free said. While he went on to name Pithecanthropus as the possible missing link between modern humans and the common ancestor we share with apes, anthropologists today believe that humans descended from homo erectus rather than Java Man.
Read the full story in "How Science Traces Our Monkey Ancestry"
"embraced... evolution as fact". So ends all science. The scientific method requires theories to be thought fallible and up to criticisms, corrections and improvements. To suggest that Evolution, including all of its presumptions, is not open to considerable criticism rubs against my arm hair and is the stuff in my appendix.
The unscientific need to circle up the wagons around Evolution is harming our academic nature.
And "No," I do not need to propose an alternative theory for the above to be true.
What? You need to learn how to write.
Hey DerivePi, your writing is somewhat confused and hazy indicating that two of your four humors are out of balance, principly black bile and phlegm. I suggest you run down to your local barber-surgeon and have a couple of purgatives administered. You may find a bleeding has a salutory effect as well. Then come back to the magic writing machine and try to rephrase your argument.