Gallery: Earth From Above

14 Comments

Image 1 and 15 are the same :-(

they are all digitally enhanced photos..... i was hoping for some cool natural ones... ooh well

noot bad :)
i especially liked the eclipse, tornado, & the fire was neat too :D ...pay attention to those earthquakes, they tend to cascade a bit ;)

in reference to photo #13

sorry about the loss of life, and how insensitive this maybe, but if those are true color photos, notice how
population = desert
and
after tsunami = vegetation

i wonder where else deserts exist that are caused only by man.
maybe we should get some more tsunamis

@Zengrath: No photos are natural, especially if taken from space

What do you expect a naturally occurring camera born of rock to be taken into space by a determined dove? How would this glorified pidgin survive a vacuum? (Something like how popcorn survives a pan, only with blood and feathers). What about re-entry?

A sad end for Valiant the naturally occurring space dove photographer.

@scubasdsteve87: Look at the dates on the photo, greenery came first. Both the tsunami and tornado pics are awesome, though I agree. My favourite is defiantly Apollo seven.

To, well, whoever has the capability to change it, but Ontario is spelled wrong.

Right, the tsunami is the big destroyer of both human life and vegetative life.

I like 3 and 6 and plus they all have pretty colors

By the one and only.........

HatisBig

@greeneax - it's been fixed.

Image 1 - Aracar Volcano, Andes Mountains
Image 15 - Mount Fuji from space

@Zengrath, I second your request for a series of natural photos (which, without playing words, means: showing as accurately as possible to us humans what we would have seen with our natural eyes if we had been in the satellites). This is not against keeping the more processed photos, that also remain useful.

Versailles, Tue 22 Jun 2010 23:07:40 +0200

Put a scale on each vertical view please POPSCI

Only photo #13 (Banda Aceh before/after 26 Dec 2004) has one so far.

Versailles, Tue 22 Jun 2010 23:10:20 +0200

why can't i see chemtrails from these photo's? you do know that their great to breathe in right?

why is it that photo's from 'space' have no stars? photoshop'd

@ Michel_Merlin, I agree with you and Zengrath. Natural photos would be a little more interesting to see I think.


140 years of Popular Science at your fingertips.



Popular Science+ For iPad

Each issue has been completely reimagined for your iPad. See our amazing new vision for magazines that goes far beyond the printed page



Download Our App

Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone or Android phone with full articles, images and offline viewing



Follow Us On Twitter

Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed


April 2013: How It Works

For our annual How It Works issue, we break down everything from the massive Falcon Heavy rocket to a tiny DNA sequencer that connects to a USB port. We also take a look at an ambitious plan for faster-than-light travel and dive into the billion-dollar science of dog food.

Plus the latest Legos, Cadillac's plug-in hybrid, a tractor built for the apocalypse, and more.


Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email
Assistant Editor: Colin Lecher | Email
Assistant Editor:Rose Pastore | Email

Contributing Writers:
Rebecca Boyle | Email
Kelsey D. Atherton | Email
Francie Diep | Email
Shaunacy Ferro | Email

circ-top-header.gif
circ-cover.gif