A government bioethics commission says yes, but only under certain circumstances.
Posted 03.20.2013 at 3:02 pm
8 Comments
Bacillus Anthracis Bacteria
Wikimedia Commons
Being an ethicist isn't easy. Here's the quandary the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues just sorted through: when it's ethical to give an anthrax vaccine to children.
In the pro column, if there was a biological attack on the U.S., vaccination would prep kids for it. But on the other hand, critics of a plan like that say, the chances of that happening are low compared to the chance that some children will react poorly during a vaccine trial. So what's the greater risk?
The bioethics commission's report released yesterday says it's worth the risk of a vaccine trial--but only if that risk is established to be very low. To do that, health officials could first test a vaccine in older age groups--late teens, say--then work their way down to young children. If the vaccine is shown to have only very mild effects on older children, like soreness from the injection, trials could progress to younger and younger children in a process called "age de-escalation." Any reactions worse than that--even as minor as a mild fever--would require "extraordinary circumstances" and approval from a national ethics panel to use on children.
The anthrax vaccine is used by adults in the military, including on men and women as young as 18, and it's effective with minimal risk. It's even made from an inactivated protein in the virus, which, as Science Insider notes, makes it similar to other childhood vaccines. But there's not data on it for children 17 and younger, which makes any call on using it on them (or not) a tough one to make.
8 Comments
To comment, please Login.
Popular Tags
Science
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 2013: American Energy Independence
Five amazing, clean technologies that will set us free, in this month's energy-focused issue. Also: how to build a better bomb detector, the robotic toys that are raising your children, a human catapult, the world's smallest arcade, and much more.
Popular on Popsci
Most Commented
Science
- Scientists Create First Cloned Human Embryo
- State Drops Charges Against High School Student Arrested For Science Experiment
- Space Tourism's Black Carbon Problem
- Giving White People The Illusion Of Darker Skin Makes Them Less Racist
- Cold Fusion Machine Gets Third-Party Verification, Inventor Says
- What Modern Humans Can Learn From The Neanderthals' Extinction
- FYI: Do Wind Farms Make It Less Windy?
- How Do You Make A Painkiller Addiction-Proof?
- Untouched For The Last Billion Years, Water In Canadian Mine Holds Ingredients For Life
- Climate Change Will Increase Heat-Related Deaths In NYC, Study Says
Most Emailed
Science
- Got A Wound? Science Says Rub Some Dirt In It
- Was The Oklahoma City Tornado The Worst In History?
- These Self-Assembling Nanoflowers Are As Beautiful As They Are Tiny
- The Moore, Oklahoma Tornado, From Space
- The Oklahoma Tornado, From Space
- Synthetic Biologists Engineer A Custom Flu Vaccine In A Week
- These Self-Assembling Nanoflowers Are As Beautiful As They Are Tiny
- FEMA's 'Waffle House Index' Rates Moore, Oklahoma, At Disaster Level Yellow
- FYI: Could Climate Change Cause More (And Bigger) Tornadoes?
- FYI: Are Unvaccinated Kids Really Causing The Whooping Cough Resurgence?
Most Viewed
Science
- Got A Wound? Science Says Rub Some Dirt In It
- Was The Oklahoma City Tornado The Worst In History?
- These Self-Assembling Nanoflowers Are As Beautiful As They Are Tiny
- The Moore, Oklahoma Tornado, From Space
- The Oklahoma Tornado, From Space
- Synthetic Biologists Engineer A Custom Flu Vaccine In A Week
- These Self-Assembling Nanoflowers Are As Beautiful As They Are Tiny
- FEMA's 'Waffle House Index' Rates Moore, Oklahoma, At Disaster Level Yellow
- FYI: Could Climate Change Cause More (And Bigger) Tornadoes?
- FYI: Are Unvaccinated Kids Really Causing The Whooping Cough Resurgence?
Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email
Assistant Editor: Colin Lecher | Email
Assistant Editor: Rose Pastore | Email
Contributing Writers:
Rebecca Boyle | Email
Kelsey D. Atherton | Email
Francie Diep | Email
Shaunacy Ferro | Email
Today on PopSci.com
Copyright © 2012 Popular Science
A Bonnier Corporation Company. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.
Tuskegee syphilis experiment
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuskegee_syphilis_experiment
US scientists 'knew Guatemala syphilis tests unethical'
www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-latin-america-14712089
US says sorry for 'outrageous and abhorrent' Guatemalan syphilis tests
www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/oct/01/us-apology-guatemala-syphilis-tests
Remember this is the same government running our country to bankruptcy and frozen with decision making.
I do not see good decision making coming from this GOV... nope, no way.
.............................
Oh, by the way, the FISCAL CLIFF THINGY LAW, that was voted for and never supposes to happen. Besides this actually happen is POINT PROOF and creation of a LEGAL FACT by our own government declaring themselves incompetent when they say up front this is a bad law, pass it and then let it happen.
BY FACT OF LAW, THEY SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM OFFICE FOR LEGAL PROOF OF INCOMPENTENCY AND THEY< THEMSELVES CREATED THE SAID FACTUAL PROOF!
.................. i diggess.
No offense but I wish more people who complain about our government would actually do something to change it.
bob clemintime,
I am a veteran\patriot and do currently work with the government. ;)
Of course if there was an outbreak, people couldn't shove needles into their kids fast enough and the outrage, and congressional hearing on why we didn't have a vaccine tested beforehand would provide soapbox opportunities for politicians for months.
As a child,I think this is a good idea.I'll be the coolest kid at school if i got the anthrax vaccine.(I am a real child)