The fastest chemical rocket ever, the Star-48 engine was built to launch satellites and was recently incorporated into the New Horizons probe, which took off in 2006. Powered by burning a mixture of ammonium perchlorate and aluminum, it boosted the Pluto-bound probe to approximately 36,000 miles per hour. New Horizons should reach Pluto and its moons by July 2015.
First Used For Propulsion 1980
Ion thrusters rely on electromagnetic effects to accelerate charged particles out the back of a spacecraft, generating propulsive force. Up to 50 times as efficient as chemical rockets, they are now primarily used for satellite station-keeping. NASA’s Deep Space 1, launched in 1998, was the first probe to use an ion engine for main propulsion. Dawn, which is currently exploring the asteroid belt, also uses one.
First Used For Propulsion 1998
Like regular sails that gather momentum from wind, solar sails rely on the momentum of sunlight. Only a handful have been tested in space so far, including the Japanese Ikaros, a private effort called LightSail, and NASA’s NanoSail-D. Scientists are working on creating lighter materials and more reliable deployment methods, both of which could boost speeds.
First Interplanetary Flight 2010
Probably the fastest propulsion system scientists could build right now, external pulsed plasma propulsion would explode hundreds of nuclear weapons behind a spacecraft. The ship would ride in front of the shock waves. The idea was first studied in the late 1940s, and, technically, it could work. But implementing it is tricky: Launching a spaceship loaded with hundreds of nuclear weapons is far from safe.
Concept Tested 1957
Much like a regular rocket with a more efficient heat source, fusion rockets would heat fuel and shoot it out the back. Scientists have been toying with the idea since the British Interplanetary Society’s Daedalus study in the 1970s. Recently, scientists in Project Icarus, an update of Daedalus, reimagined the fusion rocket with more modern techniques. But until researchers get fusion to work well on Earth, the rockets remain far-fetched.
Projected Readiness Date 2030
The only technology that would, in principle, cross the otherwise sacrosanct barrier of light speed, warp drive would use large amounts of negative energy to create a bubble in space-time. It would contract space-time in front of a craft and expand it behind. Instead of traveling through space, a warp-enabled craft would, in a sense, travel on space, riding the space-time deformations.
Projected Readiness Date TBD
Read the Popular Science profile of NASA engineer Harold "Sonny" White and his research into warp drives here, from the April 2013 issue of the magazine.
140 years of Popular Science at your fingertips.
Each issue has been completely reimagined for your iPad. See our amazing new vision for magazines that goes far beyond the printed page
Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone or Android phone with full articles, images and offline viewing
Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed
For our annual How It Works issue, we break down everything from the massive Falcon Heavy rocket to a tiny DNA sequencer that connects to a USB port. We also take a look at an ambitious plan for faster-than-light travel and dive into the billion-dollar science of dog food.
Plus the latest Legos, Cadillac's plug-in hybrid, a tractor built for the apocalypse, and more.

Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email
Assistant Editor: Colin Lecher | Email
Assistant Editor:Rose Pastore | Email
Contributing Writers:
Rebecca Boyle | Email
Kelsey D. Atherton | Email
Francie Diep | Email
Shaunacy Ferro | Email
FUSION ROCKETS, FUSION ENERGY = MONEY PIT, lol.
This article is very interesting in Propulsion systems and a really cool follow up article might be the future space habitats that support this long distance space travel.
Of course, if a serious article went over the hazards of living in cosmic space were disscussed, it may give an opening to the possibilty of not have traveled to the moon or anywhere beyond the van allen belt.
So yes, I like to see a serious article of "habitats that support this long distance space travel".
I see one of the major inhibitors of deep space travel not just propulsion and distance, but the fact that its still a challenge and expensive to get anything big into space. It took a 300 foot tall rocket just to send a ship slightly larger than a mini van to the moon. If we could build some kind of shipyard in orbit or build bigger, more efficient rockets, then we could make bigger ships that would be able to counter some of the problems with interplanetary travel. For example, a ship of sufficient size could have a rotating section to simulate gravity and counter the effects of prolonged exposure to zero g. It would also allow for the fuel and supplies needed for longer journeys.
Funny how VASIMR was never really discussed at length.
VASIMR falls in the ion thruster category. That is to say it belongs in the same category as ion thrusters as it is a form of electro-magnetic propulsion that utilizes a low thrust, high specific impulse method of propulsion.
The NAUTILUS-X concept as an orbitally parked craft for space travel would be best suited for more than a few of these propulsion concepts. Most specifically, electro-magnetic, external pulse plasma, fusion propulsion, and warp drive.