What Animal Urine Can Teach Us About Climate Change

Sounds like another scientist attempting to suck off the climate change teat

@Imatardbot2

You comment is pointless.

If you want to understand the environment where it has been and maybe where it is going them research like this should be applauded by both sides of the climate change debate. More Fact based evidence is useful if you want the truth.

If you do not want to know the truth then feel free to denigrate legitimate research.

Its a very well known fact that when you link something to climate change your study stands a better chance of getting funding, I really doubt there is any useful information about the climate in rodent urine, and when they come to the same conclusion they will doctor the results to say otherwise, then attempt to get more funding

So you are arguing that any research performed that has any ties to climate science is false? That all data used that explains climate science is fabricated?

And we should all listen to you because you DOUBT that there is any useful info in this study? You apparently doubt everything related to climate science, so listening to your opinion on the matter seems like simply giving up on science.

Anyone that jumps up and shouts I am studying this or that for climate change is suspect of attempting to get some free milk

Suspect all you want. But that doesn't mean you have to bury your head in the sand based on ridiculous conspiracy fears.

There is no conspiracy when it comes to money and figuring out ways to get as much as you can.

also I find it interesting that you know so much about me that you are comfortable putting words into my mouth and guessing where my head is ;0)

There is no guessing where your head is.

You write:

Saying you are studying climate change is a good way to get funding.
You doubt that there is any evidence of climate change in the animal's urine. (Based on 0 knowledge on your part, unless of course you have performed similar studies that you forgot to mention)
You then state as fact that the person performing the research will come to your baseless conclusion.
After that beauty, you claim that the researcher, who you have never met or had any other reason to doubt, will falsify his research in order to get more money.

And you think I am out of place making assumptions about you?

So other then launching a personal attack against me do you have anything of value to add to the conversation?

It seems like to me most proxy data used to reconstruct climate history is poor science at best, one case Micheal Mann and his yamal tree cores, he tossed out all the ones that didn't match his work, and used just 3 out of hundreds, this kind of shenanigans is typical of climate research these days

Remove politics from science and we just might get back on the right track ;0)

Curious as to how you want to proceed with climate research since you doubt everyone performing it?

My addition to this thread is to point out your unwillingness support one man's research because you doubt the research of others. Your comments should be ignored by those undecided on the matter, as you have demonstrated a willing ignorance.

I apologize if you feel the only way to add to the thread is to slander the researcher, not the commenter who does so.

just as I thought nothing to add and a weak attempt at trolling....Fail