Live From The White House: A Q&A About Climate And Energy

Yes the real name for this site/magazine should be Political Science or Pol-Sci.com. They are now just the voice of Mr. Obama. No real science here, just move along.

I think the idea of opening up to accept questions and comments is a great platform for project start ups.

We are one such start up company, Mind Step Energy, that are in the process of renewal of our NASA technology lease agreement we are making land lease agreements at the Salton Sea region to help clean the water while at the same time creating bio-fuel and Algae bio-mass.

our page is bare at the moment since we are putting all efforts into our launch project and graphics for investors.

http://msenergy.net/

Systems and technology explained:
Jonathan Trent

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-HE4Hfa-OY

This simple technology uses untreated sewer water and creates bio-fuel/bio-mass while putting out fresh water. This is a game changer and we hope the White house would be interested about hearing more on our efforts to launch this project here in California.

Please watch the video that explains the simplicity of the technology and feel free to contact us. We are looking for a startup demonstration site investment of 100k to show proof of concept. Let us know if anyone is interested and we can share our information and proforma breakdowns.

Best,

Nathan White
urbanrealitydesignstudio@gmail.com
714.262.5177

Chris Houtz
choutz@msenergy.net

Hey you guys realize that your video is set to private and nobody can view it, right?

I'm making $86 an hour working from home. I was shocked when my neighbour told me she was averaging $95 but I see how it works now. I feel so much freedom now that I'm my own boss. This is what I do,

jump30.com

I agree. Science biased. Why not change name to Sci-bi.com?

@Gman46 & @gizmowiz

You do realize that the vast majority of the scientific community, and the overwhelming majority of Climate Scientists (you know, those people with PhD's that actually study climate), have come to the conclusion that global temperatures are rising and humans are contributing to it.

The only scientists who tend to doubt it are those Geologists working in the carbon based energy fields, and Meteorologists who tend to have Bachelor Degrees rather than PhD's (and study short term weather rather than long-term climate for that matter). Even amongst these groups though the numbers still lean to the warming side.

The only real loud voices who think this is biased or a sham come from politicians and think tanks that are funded by the energy industry.

So wouldn't it be "biases" of PopSci not to report the science as scientists see it currently. You know, rather than going with what the politicians are told by their corporate lobbyists to say...