In 140 characters or less, the info that didn't get through peer review.

#OverlyHonestMethods
#OverlyHonestMethods Storify/Beckie Port

If an experiment is any good, the process needs to be replicated. That requires some details on the methods researchers used.

But, uh, how detailed, exactly?

Scientists have been playing off that idea, tweeting the TMI parts of their methods with the hashtag #OverlyHonestMethods.

Here are some classics:

AND: Many more are collected in this Storify from Beckie Port:

[The Node]

3 Comments

Scientists are overrated, they are humans with all the failings of every other human, don't turn them into the gods they're not.

"Experiment was repeated until we had three statistically significant similar results and could discard the outliers"

How do you think they got the 'evidence' that man is warming up everything?

I can't pick a favorite - they're all funny as he11! True, true ...



June 2013: American Energy Independence

Five amazing, clean technologies that will set us free, in this month's energy-focused issue. Also: how to build a better bomb detector, the robotic toys that are raising your children, a human catapult, the world's smallest arcade, and much more.


Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email
Assistant Editor: Colin Lecher | Email
Assistant Editor: Rose Pastore | Email

Contributing Writers:
Rebecca Boyle | Email
Kelsey D. Atherton | Email
Francie Diep | Email
Shaunacy Ferro | Email

circ-top-header.gif
circ-cover.gif