When it comes to therapeutic fecal transplants, sometimes the real stuff just won't cut it.

Clostridium difficile
Clostridium difficile Wikimedia Commons

Poop slinging isn't just for monkeys anymore -- in this day and age, you can also pay a doctor to do it. Fecal transplants, which have been around since at least 1958, aim to correct an upset in the normal bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract by introducing someone else's waste into it, in the hopes that it will restore the balance of microbes necessary for normal digestion. With a 90 percent success rate, it's gross, but effective.

The process is much how you would imagine it -- a small amount of donor feces are inserted into the intestines during a colonoscopy or with an enema. The latest discovery in the realm of medical poop treatments may make the procedure less icky: Researchers are developing a synthetic version.

Normally, when feces from a healthy person are inserted into a sick person's large intestine, there's a risk that the donor may transmit an infection along with their healthy bacteria, or that the patient's body won't accept the transmission. There's also the fact that the sample needs to be "fresh." Plus, of course, the fact that people tend to balk at putting someone else's feces inside their body.

But now scientists have found away to circumvent those complications: fake poop. In a study published in January's Microbiome, researchers mixed purified intestinal bacterial cultures from a healthy donor to form RePOOPulate, a synthetic stool mixture.

It was then transplanted (part of it, the study notes, was "drizzled") into two patients with Clostridium difficile infection, an affliction causing severe diarrhea that's set off when antibiotics alter the bacteria in your gut. Both patients were women in their 70s who had experienced recurring CDI.

Two to three days after the treatment, the study's two participants regained their normal bowel patterns, which were still normal six months later. The necessary bacteria had successfully set up their colon colonization, using RePOOPulate as their Mayflower.

Since it is synthetic, RePOOPulate can be tailored to the patient's needs. It's also safer and more stable than the natural method, which might introduce a virus as well as the desired bacteria. Plus, a synthetic mixture can be reproduced as many times as necessary if future treatment is needed.

Researchers plan to continue studying the effectiveness of the stool substitute. With only two subjects in this experiment, the treatment is still in its preliminary stages, but it suggests synthetic stool could be a viable alternative in the future.

[National Geographic]

5 Comments

What an unexpected combination of words. "therapeutic fecal transplants"

Well my first thought was "Why transplant the poop if you just need the bacteria?"
And it took medical professionals 55 years to figure that out?
Why do we pay these people so much?

killerT,
I have read in the digestive track there can be from trillions of different organisms. So then, scientist has to isolate who are the good guys and who are the bad guys and understand what balance there is. Perhaps even a particular bacteria that is considered a bad guys, might be still important in maintaining a normal balance, so is necessary.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gut_flora

Then there are yeast type organisms that if they get past the skin barrier of our body that protects us internally and externally can create all sorts of havoc. Many yeast are immune to antibiotics and to the current drugs that eliminate them, can adapt extremely quick past them.

When our digestive flora balance breaks down or gets into our body’s system, we can actually die quickly! Knowing the quantity of flora –trillions- and their adaptability, it is a wonder we exist at all and bacteria in the world rule the Earth!

It makes sense to me, that medical science has taken so long in this particular science. YEA medical science!

I think I need a transplant actually.

When I read articles like this I am glad I am a solid state scientist. I can not imagine giving a presentation on this subject.


140 years of Popular Science at your fingertips.



Popular Science+ For iPad

Each issue has been completely reimagined for your iPad. See our amazing new vision for magazines that goes far beyond the printed page



Download Our App

Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone or Android phone with full articles, images and offline viewing



Follow Us On Twitter

Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed


February 2013: How To Build A Hero

Engineers are racing to build robots that can take the place of rescuers. That story, plus a city that storms can't break and how having fun could lead to breakthrough science.

Also! A leech detective, the solution to America's train-crash problems, the world's fastest baby carriage, and more.



Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email

Contributing Writers:
Clay Dillow | Email
Rebecca Boyle | Email
Colin Lecher | Email
Emily Elert | Email

Intern:
Shaunacy Ferro | Email

circ-top-header.gif
circ-cover.gif
bmxmag-ps