One of the strangest developments in the whole history of human art came in 1911, when famous painters began producing pieces that looked--to the untrained eye, at any rate--like the work of an industrious three-year-old. The paintings had colors and lines and sometimes shapes, but those weren't arranged in a way that resembled people or chairs or fruit or any other thing that exists in the real world. Or, as the curators at New York's Museum of Modern Art (MoMA) put it in the museum's exhibition Inventing Abstraction, the paintings "dispensed with recognizable subject matter."
To help us understand how such a bold new form of expression gained the traction and influence it did over a span of just a few years, designers and curators at MoMA created a visualization that shows the many interpersonal connections between abstract artists of the era.
According to its creators, the diagram shows that "abstraction was not the inspiration of a solitary genius but the product of network thinking--of ideas moving through a nexus of artists and intellectuals working in different mediums and in far-flung places."
Check out the full graphic here.
140 years of Popular Science at your fingertips.
Each issue has been completely reimagined for your iPad. See our amazing new vision for magazines that goes far beyond the printed page
Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone or Android phone with full articles, images and offline viewing
Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed
Engineers are racing to build robots that can take the place of rescuers. That story, plus a city that storms can't break and how having fun could lead to breakthrough science.
Also! A leech detective, the solution to America's train-crash problems, the world's fastest baby carriage, and more.


Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email
Contributing Writers:
Clay Dillow | Email
Rebecca Boyle | Email
Colin Lecher | Email
Emily Elert | Email
Intern:
Shaunacy Ferro | Email
in order to thank everyone, characteristic, novel style, varieties, low price and good quality, and the low sale price. Thank everyone
http://al.ly/AvJ
http://al.ly/AvJ
http://al.ly/AvJ
http://al.ly/AvJ
│\_╭╭╭╭╭_/│
│ │\|/
│ ● ● │—☆—
│○ ╰┬┬┬╯ ○│/|\
│ ╰—╯ /
╰—┬○————┬○╯
╭│ │╮
╰┴—————┴╯ sdfgwewe
It's interesting how artists were able to communicate and "network" ideas in a pre-internet era. Today, this social collaboration is almost never found unaccompanied by the Internet.
upto I saw the draft of $6522, I have faith that...my... mother in law was trully receiving money parttime on their apple laptop.. there mums best friend has been doing this 4 less than 13 months and resantly repayed the depts on there mini mansion and bourt a great new Car. read more at......
_________
BIT40.ℂOM
_________
I think I prefer realism over abstract art.
Realism takes time to create an object, event, place, person,
I was going to delete that last line. Oh well.
Back then many abstract artist started with an object, event, place, person and then came up with a process to abstract it. I think many artist now work the other way by designing something and then making up a justification for their design. I agree though, abstract is not for everyone.