The oldest part of the universe, more than 10 billion light years away, bursts with super-luminous quasars and diffuse aggregations of hydrogen gas. Anže Slosar, a cosmologist at Brookhaven National Laboratory in New York, wants to map that expanse in 3-D.
Slosar looks for and then plots patterns in the periodic density fluctuations of matter that coalesced after the big bang. Others have mapped this structure to six billion light years away by observing how galaxies cluster, but at the universe’s far edges, galaxies are too faint to see.
To overcome this challenge, Slosar uses a new technique that many were skeptical would even work: Instead of plotting light visible to humans, he and his collaborators look at the shadows Anže Slosar
Age 34
Brookhaven National Laboratorythat massive gas clouds create when they obstruct light from the faraway quasars. For the first several months, the data looked too messy to map, and Slosar stewed in constant panic that he would fail. It took a few rounds of mathematical tweaks to coax out an actual signal. But once he did, data on 14,000 quasars from the BOSS telescope in New Mexico enabled Slosar to produce the largest-ever map of the ancient universe’s structure—between 10 and 12 billion light years away—which in turn gives scientists insight into what the universe looked like very soon after it began.
“I thought, Well, this is [what] the universe actually looks like very far away,” Slosar says. “I felt so good that I just opened a beer and stopped working for the rest of the day.”
Click here to see more from our 11th annual celebration of young researchers whose innovations will change the world
Five amazing, clean technologies that will set us free, in this month's energy-focused issue. Also: how to build a better bomb detector, the robotic toys that are raising your children, a human catapult, the world's smallest arcade, and much more.


Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email
Assistant Editor: Colin Lecher | Email
Assistant Editor: Rose Pastore | Email
Contributing Writers:
Kelsey D. Atherton | Email
Francie Diep | Email
Shaunacy Ferro | Email
I refuse to assume that WE are at the center of the universe. Ok so he's looking 10 billion years out and seeing "the edge", in one direction, how far does the other 359 degrees go? I understand that the light from those targets are XX billions of years old, thus were emitted that may years ago, but still, it does not mean that they are that old. Just because light comes into my window from 20 feet away, does not mean the light bulb is 20 feet old. We are just now looking that far away, that doesn't negate the fact that either the light source was around longer or is newer. Besides, it's been proven that Light bends with gravity and slows down in the cold... They REALLY need to STOP using Light speed as a distance marker, it's out dated and as too much potential to be inaccurate. It's like measuring with a rubber band.
Playing Devil's Advocate since 1978
"The only constant in the universe is change"
-Heraclitus of Ephesus 535 BC - 475 BC
This guy turns me on.
This article is not suggesting or implying we are at the center of our universe. Our universe appears to be expanding (at an ever increasing rate of speed), in all directions without regard to your specific point of reference.
I am my center and all I need lives in me.
And when my tummy is empty, I go buy more food, lol.
Pallas, you made a login for the purpose to make that comment. I think your login and picture is rigged and you work for PoPSCi.