Researchers at Caltech, working with French colleagues, have figured out a mechanical means to weigh the previously un-weigh-able--things like individual molecules, viruses, proteins, and other particles--at the individual level, one by one. Such a scale should lead to huge leaps in understanding of molecular processes within biological cells, as well as advances in nanotechnology and other sciences of the very small.
The device, itself only a few millionths of a meter in size, taps the changes in an oscillating sensor to deduce the mass of individual particles that come in contact with it. Molecules or particles that land on this bridge-like structure alter the oscillation frequency of the sensor in ways that can be measured to determine exactly how much the particle weighs.
This technique isn’t wholly new. Molecules have been weighed previously via mass spectroscopy, where researchers take tens of millions of molecules and ionize them, then use an electromagnetic field to manipulate the newly charged particles in ways that reveal their masses. This works well enough for particles that readily hold charges, but for larger particles and especially those of a biological nature--pathogens, proteins, viruses--that don’t hold a charge well, mass spectroscopy is less than ideal.A few years ago this same group of researchers demonstrated the ability to weigh individual particles using a vibrational method, but this method also had shortcomings. The shifts in frequencies caused by a particle landing on the sensor bridge is dependent on both the mass of the particle and its position, and the position was difficult to determine. In order to pinpoint a particle’s mass, researchers had to measure hundreds of them and essentially average the results.
The new method allows for individual molecules or particles--even large ones--to be measured one at a time. The motion of oscillation can be described as having several different modes at different frequencies and moving in different directions. One mode could be side to side vibration at one frequency, while the next mode (at a different frequency) moves up and down, and so on. The researchers found that by looking at the way a particle impacts just a couple of these known modes, they could determine the particle’s position on the sensor, filling in that critical unknown in the calculation.
Such a precise scale could allow researchers to look at proteins and other cellular components at resolutions never previously possible, offering huge insights into cellular function and the many pieces of machinery working therein. More immediately, the researchers see their technique underpinning a new generation of diagnostics that allow clinicians to identify various biomarkers in the body based simply on how much they weigh.
140 years of Popular Science at your fingertips.
Each issue has been completely reimagined for your iPad. See our amazing new vision for magazines that goes far beyond the printed page
Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone or Android phone with full articles, images and offline viewing
Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed
For our annual How It Works issue, we break down everything from the massive Falcon Heavy rocket to a tiny DNA sequencer that connects to a USB port. We also take a look at an ambitious plan for faster-than-light travel and dive into the billion-dollar science of dog food.
Plus the latest Legos, Cadillac's plug-in hybrid, a tractor built for the apocalypse, and more.

Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email
Assistant Editor: Colin Lecher | Email
Assistant Editor:Rose Pastore | Email
Contributing Writers:
Rebecca Boyle | Email
Kelsey D. Atherton | Email
Francie Diep | Email
Shaunacy Ferro | Email
This is terribly confusing. Is this thing measuring weight or mass?
I would think "weight" would be of little consequence at the molecular level, but the headline says its a "mechanical- weighing- scale"
Yah! I need to update my polyatomic ion charts again! ;)
@killerT: The two terms are often used interchangeably in casual conversation, particularly with non-science enthusiasts, because they don't really understand the difference themselves. On Earth, of course, having a specific mass implies a specific weight (which is only as accurate as you know the Earth's gravitational pull at that point in space). Find one = know the other.
I'm going to make an educated guess and say that the device actually measures mass.