Microrockets via PhysOrg

Tiny machines that can enter our bloodstreams and do work inside of our bodies are a staple of both science fiction and real-world biomedical science, as MEMS and other micromotor devices become increasingly small and effective. A team from the University of California, San Diego, is taking the idea even further by creating what it is calling “microrockets”: tiny self-propelled motors that can zip around an acidic environment, like the human stomach, without the need for any external fuel.

The microrockets are the first known example of a chemically-powered micro-machine that powers itself without carrying some kind of fuel, like hydrogen peroxide, onboard. Rather, the UCSD team’s microrockets are powered by hydrogen bubbles produced by a reaction between an acidic solution--like that present in the stomach--and the zinc that the microrocket itself is made of.

When the microrocket is immersed in that acidic environment, hydrogen bubbles quickly start to build up inside the rocket and--depending on how acidic the environment--propel it up to speeds of 100 body lengths per second. That’s about 1,050 micrometers per second for a 5-micrometer diameter microrocket (they are generally about 10 micrometers long, and between two and five micrometers in diameter). Depending on the rate of zinc dissolution, the lifetime of the microrockets once introduced to the acid solution can be anywhere from two to 10 minutes.

They are also controllable using a magnetic field. By placing a magnetic coating on the exterior of the microrockets, the UCSD team has demonstrated that the rockets can be guided through a solution and even be used to pick up and deposit cargo as they go, all by manipulating a magnetic field.

The biomedical applications here are pretty obvious. Aside from being able to do rudimentary pH sensing in the stomach, such microrockets could be used to non-invasively target drugs within the body--at least in the acidic parts--or to assist in imaging of certain parts of the body. They could also be used in industrial processes like semiconductor processing.

[PhysOrg]

7 Comments

"(they are generally about 10 micrometers wrong,"... wrong?

@Shockeray

i loled too ^^

---
bored? lets go mine the stars... ^^

Whats happening to Clay Dillow? MAybe give him a vacation or pay him more so he gives more attention to the details. The mistakes are getting amusing, thats not a good sign. :(

I am just happy the gotten the "MOTHS" out of Large Hadron Collider long ago, the POPSCI inserted in one of their articles, lol. But that article was writtne by Dan Nosowitz, I believe. I guess the all the writters of POPSCI share the same lunch room. I still love and adore POPSCI and it's articles!

.............................
Science sees no further than what it can sense.
Religion sees beyond the senses.

It's not really without fuel. It's just using a fuel strong enough to make the body out of it.

It says it doesn't carry its own fuel... then it says that its made out of fuel...
does that count as a contradiction?

I envision something like this being used to eliminate cancerous cells, but instead of just rockets, nanobots that would have built in processors enabling them to do everything needed to get rid of cancerous cells or whatever other harmful things in the body or brain!



June 2013: American Energy Independence

Five amazing, clean technologies that will set us free, in this month's energy-focused issue. Also: how to build a better bomb detector, the robotic toys that are raising your children, a human catapult, the world's smallest arcade, and much more.


Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email
Assistant Editor: Colin Lecher | Email
Assistant Editor: Rose Pastore | Email

Contributing Writers:
Rebecca Boyle | Email
Kelsey D. Atherton | Email
Francie Diep | Email
Shaunacy Ferro | Email

circ-top-header.gif
circ-cover.gif
bmxmag-ps