Potentially big stem cell news out of the New York Stem Cell Foundation Laboratory today in Nature, though in our experience it’s always good to temper one’s expectations when it comes to these sorts of things. After all, we’ve thought we cracked the code on embryonic stem cell cloning technology more than once, only to find this kind of biology is much more difficult and complex than originally thought. Nonetheless, researchers have reprogrammed an adult human egg to an embryonic state and used it to create a self-reproducing embryonic stem cell line. And that’s a big deal.
But it’s not the holy grail of stem cell research. The cell line they created doesn’t produce true clones containing perfect copies of the donor’s DNA, and therefore are more or less clinically ineffective. But the development does represent a step forward for the field, and answers some important questions plaguing stem cell science.
So here’s where we’re at: Scientists are trying to take an unfertilized egg, swap out the single set of chromosomes in the egg for the two sets of chromosomes in a patient’s adult cells, and initiate a process wherein the egg develops per the instructions of the new DNA.Usually, this process fails. Cultures stop developing after a division or two. So the NY Stem Cell team went looking for the root cause of failure. Through a series of experiments they found that whatever the problem is, it’s introduced during the removal of the egg’s native single chromosome DNA. So they did what most of us do--they skipped a step.
They just left the native DNA in there and inserted the donor DNA alongside it. The reprogramming worked, and they produced an embryo that developed up to what’s known as the blastocyst stage, where the culture contains nearly 100 cells. At this point, stem cells can be extracted from the batch.
Of course, there’s still the problem of the extra set of chromosomes rattling around in there. This makes the stem cells incompatible with the DNA donor’s tissue, so from a clinical standpoint they are roughly worthless. But from a research standpoint, a step forward is a step forward. With the problem isolated, they are now looking at new approaches to remove the native DNA from the egg that won’t cause the hiccup that halts cell division. That could take awhile, but at least now we think we’re moving in the right direction.
[Nature]
Five amazing, clean technologies that will set us free, in this month's energy-focused issue. Also: how to build a better bomb detector, the robotic toys that are raising your children, a human catapult, the world's smallest arcade, and much more.


Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email
Assistant Editor: Colin Lecher | Email
Assistant Editor: Rose Pastore | Email
Contributing Writers:
Rebecca Boyle | Email
Kelsey D. Atherton | Email
Francie Diep | Email
Shaunacy Ferro | Email
Let the trolling begin!!
Scientist created a mutant replicating and grew it up to a blastocyst stage and then are disappointed it’s a mutant. Now the task is to repeat the same replication without a mutant end result, for the purposes of growing usable stem cells that are compatible to the donor.
I am for stem cell research and I do not have a problem with this article. But, that’s me.
Wouldn't poking more than one hole in an egg be the same as 2 sperm entering?
Very neat stuff. Glad to see progrees is still being made in this field.
At the intercom:
ehhh... i would like one kidney, two finger and a toe please...
(would be nice to do it that easy as asking for a french fries at "McDoodle")
bored? lets go mine the stars... ^^
vt007,
Ahem, sir, ...
Is that for here or to go and would you like that super sized? Don't forget our scratch off contest. You may win a second brain!!!
vt007,
Just to let you know, the previous spontaneous comment just burped out of my brain. My intention was not to insult you in manner. I am very sure you brain is not need of any augmentation, accessorizing or exchange.
Ok, ok, I feel better, I just had to get that off my chest. I am done cloning around for now, lol. ;)
Why dont we get our stem cells straight from human embryos?
Ohh right because of religion hmmmm
It will be nice when we finally have nailed this technology down to cure all kinds of diseases. This way will be less controversial, I think, than taking the cells from abortions at least.
On a side note, mp was sounding like BubbaGump. No?
Stem cells do not come from abortions, that is a myth.
thank you south park, i say dump money into this, we could solve a lot of problems(paralyisis, limb replacement, stroke recovery, alzeihmers, etc.)
This milestone in stem-cell research will be invaluable to work being done with Regenerative Medicine. I recently served as the principal science advisor for a new National Geographic book, The Big Idea: How Breakthroughs of the Past Shape the Future, where we discuss the burgeoning field of regenerative medicine. Being able to work with the patient's own cells eliminate the opportunity for the body's immune system to reject the organ. It will be interesting to follow what happens next with this research.
-Prof. Jim Trefil, Principal Science Advisor The Big Idea: How Breakthroughs of the Past Shape the Future
Sorry, I didn't know that was just a myth. Although I did see that particular episode of South Park, it was not what gave me that idea. :) I should have done proper research before posting.
Anyway, this could be a way to cure tons of diseases and extend human life, if it gets the funding it needs. There is no telling the possibilities when it comes to possible treatments.
no problemo, alot of mis-information floating around, cheers
For those whose been following stem-cell related publications, notice the numerous studies done at China and Taiwan? To my fellow American, please set aside our philosophical differences and invest our energy for the greater goods. To the awesome people at NYSCF, thank you for your hard works, we all truly appreciate it!!