Some unknown terrible person shot a defenseless pilot whale last month, leaving it to swim the Atlantic in agony for weeks before it finally beached itself on the New Jersey shore and died. Authorities are still looking for the shooter. The bullet wound caused a fulminant infection in the whale’s jaw that prevented it from eating, so it basically starved to death. This was determined during a necropsy, an autopsy for animals.
Along with sympathy for the poor creature, this debacle aroused an interesting question: How does one autopsy a whale? With four-ton meat hooks, whaling knives and bone saws, actually. Michael Moore, a veterinarian and whale biologist at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, does it all the time.
Moore spends much of his time studying North Atlantic right whales, an endangered species whose name derives from whalers’ adage that these were the “right whales” to hunt, because they’re easy to spot and float when they die. They’re no longer hunted for their oil, but they are entangled in fishing lines and injured in ship collisions, often suffering for a great while and also succumbing to starvation. “It’s the most egregious animal welfare issue globally at this time,” in Moore’s words. But protecting them requires understanding how they died, and to do this Moore must take them apart, studying their broken bones and lobster net-tangled flukes to determine their exact causes of death.
In partnership with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Moore deploys on-call, toting a case full of knives to examine right whales that have beached or are floating in the open ocean. Right whales are baleen whales and at least two orders of magnitude bigger than the toothed pilot whale that was shot, so in most cases, they must be examined right where they‘re found — that means on the beach. They either beach themselves and die there, or they’re towed to shore once they have been located at sea.Moore and other rubber-suited biologists work amid 120,000 pounds of slick black-and-red whale flesh, clambering over and through the carcass to find out what went wrong. Time is of the essence, because the longer they wait, the more the animal’s internal organs break down, making it difficult to determine how it died.
Moore uses a Japanese whaling hook, which is useful for pulling back sheets of blubber to get at the animal’s internal organs. He carries a bone saw — formerly his mother’s — to get through jaws and vertebrae to find the location of a fatal injury. He’s even visited indigenous Alaskan tribes to study their ancestral whale processing techniques.
The pilot whale that died was small, so it was trucked to a necropsy facility at the the Marine Mammal Stranding Center in Brigantine, N.J., down the shore north of Atlantic City. It weighed about 740 pounds when it beached, quite gaunt for an animal that should normally weigh more than a ton. Researchers knew something was seriously wrong, but they had to perform a necropsy to determine what it was.

The creatures are brought in on trucks and hoisted into the facility on chains rigged to the ceiling, attached to four-ton-rated meat hooks. They lay on negative-pressure steel tables, the same types used in human autopsy procedures, which suck out odors and pathogens as the biologists get to work. The lab also contains deep freezers for stringing up deceased animals; it harbors an overwhelming odor of chemical and organic substances. (It’s somewhat legendary at WHOI that Moore lost his sense of smell while in veterinary school, which he says enables him to get literally inside a rotting animal carcass without losing his lunch or his cool.)
The 11-foot-long pilot whale died shortly after authorities reached its side on the beach on Sept. 24. But it wasn’t until a necropsy a couple weeks later that they knew what happened. The bullet entered near its blow hole, but the wound had closed and faded a bit, suggesting it had been shot about a month prior. The .30-caliber round lodged in its jaw, causing the infection.
“This poor animal literally starved to death,” said Bob Schoelkopf, co-director of the Marine Mammal Stranding Center, in an interview with the AP. “It was wandering around and slowly starving to death because of the infection. Who would do that to an innocent animal?”
That question is now in the hands of the authorities. For biologists like Moore and Schoelkopf, necropsies can at least answer the question of how. Why, of course, is something else entirely.
Five amazing, clean technologies that will set us free, in this month's energy-focused issue. Also: how to build a better bomb detector, the robotic toys that are raising your children, a human catapult, the world's smallest arcade, and much more.


Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email
Assistant Editor: Colin Lecher | Email
Assistant Editor: Rose Pastore | Email
Contributing Writers:
Rebecca Boyle | Email
Kelsey D. Atherton | Email
Francie Diep | Email
Shaunacy Ferro | Email
certainly not by using crapple products
Lobsters are caught in traps, not in nets. So, a "lobster net" doesn't affect whales because there are no lobster nets. Seems to me that if you're going to write about something, you ought to know something about it, or have someone fact check the details.
Wow, "at least two orders of magnitude bigger", so it was over ONE HUNDRED times bigger than the other whale?
Yeah, I didn't think so.
@bobclyde...Lobster Net 15" x 15" x 24" @ www.leisurepro.com - maybe you should get informed yourself...@Polynices: Right Whales typically wiegh 60-80 tons (120,000 lbs. to 160,000 lbs.) you need to fact check also before nitpicking, negative cheers
drchuck1:
The lobster net you refer to is a hand-held net, much like a butterfly net, used by divers to catch spiny lobsters, primarily in Florida and the Caribbean. They are not used in New England. And, in any case, they are too small to affect even a relatively small pilot whale.
I think the author meant gill nets which are used in New England and elsewhere and which can entrap a whale.
And lobsters in Maine and elsewhere in New England are caught in traps, not nets of any kind.
My point about fact checking stands.
I will second the previous comments...
This is the 5th article in last month that seems to be written (by different authors) for the sake of writing without checking the facts properly..
Sorry to say that I am losing my confidence on popsci seeing unfortunately this many dubious pseudoscientific blubber :-(
after rereading the article the auther refered to fishing lines and lobster nets when he should have said lobster lines and fishing nets, an easy mistake that should have been caught; however, the main focus of the story was injured whales from fishing devices, idiots harming whales for fun, and autopsies of dead whales, imop you are nitpicking (passive agressive trolling)
Not to nitpick but I believe autopsies are conducted on humans and necropsies are conducted on animals.
good one, cheers
Could you please correct the headline to "necropsy" so it matches the (accurate) text in the article itself. mparker07 is correct: Unless another whale is performing the procedure, it's not an autopsy!
do you realize the only editing of these articles id done buy computers. The software does not diffrentiate between lobster or fish when it only expects a noun! I am not impressed at all.