Combing through the night sky and looking for possible planetary nebulae is tough, tedious work. NASA actually works with several amateur astronomy groups to examine the findings from its Kepler space observatory, so sometimes, the big discoveries are made by amateurs--including this one, the newest known planetary nebula, named Kronberger 61.
This image, provided by the Gemini Observatory, shows the "ionized shell of expelled gas," colored blue due to the double-ionization of the oxygen. If you look closely, you can see the star at the center of the system--it's the bright bluish dot near the center of the blue-raspberry-like shell.
The Kepler mission's goal is to find Earth-like planets, so the discovery of a new planetary nebula opens up the possibility for some exciting new discoveries. It'll take a lot more examination to find out if there are any "Goldlocks planets," close enough but not too close to a star to foster the kind of life we have on Earth, but the discovery certainly opens the door for that kind of study.
The star was discovered by, and named for, an amateur Austrian astronomer named Matthias Kronberger, who works with a group of other amateurs known as Deep Sky Hunters.
[via Wired]
Five amazing, clean technologies that will set us free, in this month's energy-focused issue. Also: how to build a better bomb detector, the robotic toys that are raising your children, a human catapult, the world's smallest arcade, and much more.


Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email
Assistant Editor: Colin Lecher | Email
Assistant Editor: Rose Pastore | Email
Contributing Writers:
Rebecca Boyle | Email
Kelsey D. Atherton | Email
Francie Diep | Email
Shaunacy Ferro | Email
You answered my question in the article. I know space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind- bogglingly big it is, but I just have to ask what are the people who get paid to be astronomers doing, you know the "professional" ones. It seems that lately I have read more articles about "amateurs" making new finds in space than the pros. Have we arrived at the point were technology which is allowing more of these "amateurs" do the leg work and the "professionals" do the paper work? I think I may have just solved the US's problems. lol
1. Life lives on earth and this is obvious, in all corners.
*2. Life lives in the entire universe and in all corners.
3. Life is varies on earth.
* 4. Life is varies throughout the universe and beyond.
5. People exist with good and evil. It is natural and often.
* Intelligent life exists in the universe, good and evil.
6. Humans are just an ant in a universe that is so big, beyond really our understanding.
7. Belief in our dear Lord and the Trinity and the heart of its understanding is our hope and future, but be it
It known, there is much more in the universe beyond this.
** Both exist and knowing their existence is absolute.
** Our existence will end in one of these paths.
@I4Future You may have a point. The pros seem to be slacking. It may be due to the bureaucratic systems once a certain rank is achieved. But I can tell you one thing, I rather a planet where any individual with the appropriate tools can add to scientific study and discovery. The pro's will just be here for Maintenance and vocalize to larger and reputable forums.
*** no violence. be kind and decent to each other. if you spend any and all moments of you life praising our dear Lord, you spent a good life. if a outsider comes to you and brings a convincing argument of harm, just live a good life and die loving, don’t be tempted. do not be afraid of the stars and knowing there is much more than ourselves. its ok, and everything is going to be alright.
@l4Future
I think we've arrived at the point in technology where the data collection is way outpacing the data examination. The pros right now are finding new and better ways to collect new and better data, while other pros and amateurs comb through the data and get credited with the actual discovery.
When you consider an amateur discovery like this, consider the people who engineered the giant telescope that even took the picture in the first place. This is where the "pros" are, and the pros are getting worried about whether they'll ever actually be able to process all the data they're collecting.
Maybe someday someone will write a computer algorithm that automatically finds astronomical objects in the data, but right now, we're relying on as many people as are willing to look through it.
The nebula looks like a complex dodecahedron. I wonder what forces are imprinting geometry on this structure. Kinda like how our own galaxy permeates via the Fibonacci sequence.
I have the same question; what causes this shape? I recall seeing on Sci channel that the universe may take the same "soccer ball" shape. Could there be a relationship?
@phlynhi
This is just a theory, all energy in our 3D universe comes spinning out of the 4th dimension. The imprints are left in the form of geometry. Tg
This accounts for why all atoms are spinning.
Google sacred geometry
Google giant hexagon formation on Saturn
Google Universe is a double tarus
* Universe is a double torus
This blue nebula is a back fire to a poorly design intergalactic space ship that has just left the quadrant in desperate need of a tune up.
the amount of data is the problem, not the professionals slacking, JeffreyE has it right
@phlynhi, it's a common phenomenon with expanding gasses.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=x4WuFU6XV_o&feature=related
My guess is it has to do with minute variations in the force of the explosion for different directions, along with interaction with pre-existing material in the path of expanding gas.