A new generation of e-nose uses a DNA scaffolding and molecular fluorescence to distinguish among various vapors, in a breakthrough that could make electronic sniffers more powerful and simpler to produce, according to researchers at Stanford University.

The method could conceivably detect anything from spoiled milk to explosives, the researchers say -- a major advancement over existing e-noses, which search for only a couple of specific molecules.

Fluorescent DNA: Florent Samain displays a fluorescence microscope image showing how the fluorescent sensors change color in the presence of organic vapors.  Linda Cicero, Stanford University News Service
The e-nose involves attaching fluorescent compounds onto strands of DNA molecules, which then change color in the presence of certain substances. Stanford chemistry professor Eric Kool says one sensor could tell the difference between four organic vapors, because it would change colors with each one.

To make the sensors, the team took one side of a DNA double helix and replaced its four bases with fluorescent base-pair substitutes, according to a Stanford news release. Unhindered by the second helix backbone, the stacked bases protrude from the DNA strand like whiskers, ready to sense organic vapors.

The team could choose among seven replacement bases, so they used DNA synthesis technology to come up with a library of all the 2,401 ways they could combine into a string of four units. Then they tested all those combinations to see how they responded to various substances, including industrial solvent, aquatic herbicide and explosive-preparation materials.

Multiple sensor arrangements demonstrated a marked fluorescent response when exposed to the test substances, Kool says. DNA base pairs communicate electronically, so rearranging the synthetic bases resulted in different responses to the same stimuli, he added.

Next up is making a sensor array that can detect a wide range of substances, according to Kool. "Because we get such a diversity of responses -- even one molecule can tell the difference among four different things -- we could have a set of 10 or 20, or 100 sensors, which would give a vast array of responses to many different kinds of molecules."

The study was published online this week in the German journal Angewandte Chemie (Applied Chemistry).

[Eurekalert via MedicalDaily]

4 Comments

All spam aside, I hope, would this be implemented like chemical detection paper or would there be a device with an actual read-out?

"When I examine myself and my methods of thought, I come to the conclusion that the gift of fantasy has meant more to me than my talent for absorbing positive knowledge."

-Albert Einstein


138 years of Popular Science at your fingertips.

Innovation Challenges



Popular Science+ For iPad

Each issue has been completely reimagined for your iPad. See our amazing new vision for magazines that goes far beyond the printed page



Download Our App

Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone or Android phone with full articles, images and offline viewing



Follow Us On Twitter

Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed


February 2012: The Future of Fun

Science is reinventing play, from extreme sports to gamification to ridiculous roller coasters to the playgrounds of tomorrow, and this issue is chock full of fun. Also, on a less fun note: Did global warming destroy my hometown?


circ-top-header.gif
circ-cover.gif