Global Shipping It's an energy suck, but new hydrophobic hulls could reduce friction – and fuel costs.

If you’re an ocean-transiting container ship, friction is a drag. The bigger your load, the more energy it takes to propel you through the water, and that means increased fuel costs and increased emissions. But by mimicking the hydrophobic characteristics of the water fern, researchers at the University of Bonn think they can create container ships that move faster – and more efficiently – from port to port.

Materials scientists long ago started producing synthetic hydrophobic materials. But while some of them work very well, they aren’t very durable in moving water, lasting only a few hours. The water fern, however, is superhydrophobic. When completely immersed in water it still remains dry thanks to small, fibrous hairs that hug a thin cushion of air close to the plant's body that water simply can’t penetrate, even if the fern is submerged for weeks.

But the water fern’s hydrophobia wouldn’t be possible without a certain degree of hydrophilia. The tips of the hairs actually share a strong attraction with water. When submerged, water molecules rush to the hairs which essentially “staple” the water molecules to the plant, enveloping the fern and refusing to let the air cushion escape. It’s this discovery that could lead to a serious breakthrough for superhydrophobic synthetics.

The researchers believe they could design container ships with hulls that exhibit similar hydrophobic properties, keeping a slight cushion of air between ocean and ocean-liner and cutting down on fuel costs and emissions by ten percent. Considering that global shipping emitted 847 million tons of CO2 in 2007 alone (that’s nearly 3 percent of man-made emissions that year), that’s no small reduction. The researchers estimate such technology could trim a full percent off global fuel consumption.

[Smart Planet, University of Bonn]

6 Comments

I guess the concept of a hydrophobic coating isn't new, right? I thought this sort of thing was already implemented. I know that it's banned from sailing. No hydrophobic or hydrophilic coatings are allowed.

DDTx2

from Caracas, Miranda

If they combine this technology with sails, like the skysails, could be even more green.

CO2 doesn't matter. But efficiency is good.

Agree with Brian H. Efficiency to reduce cost is good for everybody. CO2 doesn't matter, as far as a pollutant goes.

isint this basically the same kind of tech the navy is trying to use on their subs?

like a giant airbubble that quadruples sub speeds.

Military Subs are suppose to be secretive, having a 'noisy' bubble trail would defeat that purpose. But I am curious, the gecko, has the same technology of tiny hairs that attract electrons to stick to any surface. What is the differences between the two? The tips attract water molecules, but what else would 'stick' to it? Barnacle would not like the air gap so should be a solution for this, too.

So, how much solar energy have you used today?


138 years of Popular Science at your fingertips.

Innovation Challenges



Popular Science+ For iPad

Each issue has been completely reimagined for your iPad. See our amazing new vision for magazines that goes far beyond the printed page



Download Our App

Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone or Android phone with full articles, images and offline viewing



Follow Us On Twitter

Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed


February 2012: The Future of Fun

Science is reinventing play, from extreme sports to gamification to ridiculous roller coasters to the playgrounds of tomorrow, and this issue is chock full of fun. Also, on a less fun note: Did global warming destroy my hometown?


circ-top-header.gif
circ-cover.gif