Deep Red via Video Magica

As Doctor Hibert so eloquently put, "only one in two million people has what we call the "evil gene". Hitler had it, Walt Disney had it, and Freddy Quimby has it." And while we understand that line as a joke, it seems that an Italian court has taken the idea far more seriously.

For the first time ever, an Italian court reduced the sentence of a convicted murderer after forensic scientists highlighted the presence of a gene linked to violent behavior as evidence of the murderer's soundness of mind. The court, convinced that the criminal was not fully in control of his actions, and thus less liable for the crime, reduced the penalty from nine years behind bars to eight.

The genetic evidence was introduced in conjunction with brain scans that showed abnormalities in the murderer's brain, along with reports from conventional psychiatrists. While the defense managed to produce a wealth of evidence, from a variety of sources, to show the murderer suffered from mental illness, the genetic evidence was by far the strangest.

Scientists showed that the murderer under-expressed the gene that codes for the neurotransmitter-metabolizing enzyme monoamine oxidase A (MAOA). In 2002, a study in England found an association between low MAOA expression and violent and criminal behavior by boys raised in abusive households.

While I can't speak to the solidity of the psychiatric assessment (assuming it wasn't conducted by Sam Loomis), the genetic argument sounds a bit dodgy. That being said, the low MAOA expression argument has already been used a few times in the US. While its usually disregarded by the judge, it has influenced sentencing more than once.

[via Nature News]

3 Comments

Finding a reason for negative behavior does not excuse a person from doing that behavior. Nor does it reduce their culpability. Their supposed inability to control themselves means that they need to have a severe reduction in their personal freedoms. If you cannot help hurting others you're a bigger threat than someone who can.

That could be a lucrative gene to patent. Pay me $10,000 to get a test that will reduce your sentenced. Oh and I'm the only one that can test you because I own the gene.

umm I must have a gene that makes me realize that this is stupid. If you can't control your actions due to something like this you cannot be rehabilitated and should remain locked up at least until your too old and frail to do any harm. I think not possesing the gen would be a better reason for a shorter sentence, the person could be rehabilitated and learn that they shouldn't do these things and keep themselves from causing any harm.

Popular Tags

Regular Features

  • The Doctor Is In with Isadora Botwinick | Weird and wild stories of the human body, health and disease
  • Sex Files with Susannah F. Locke | A broad view of new research and ideas in the sexiest of the hard sciences
  • Science Confirms the Obvious with Laura Allen | The research that makes us say "duh"



Download Our iPhone App

Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone with full articles, images and offline viewing



Follow Us On Twitter

Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed



Become a Fan On Facebook

Share links with friends, comment on stories and more


December 2009: Best of What's New

In our December issue, Popular Science names the 100 best innovations of the year: bombproof wallpaper, self-parking cars, the fastest helicopter, and 97 more. Plus inventor profiles and videos.

Check out the best of what's new here.

Popular Science Photo Pool


Share your photos in the Pop Sci pool at www.flickr.com!
tags_sprite.png
POP_embeddedForm_cover_May09.jpg