Feature
Meet PopSci's annual Brilliant 10--a selection of the brightest young researchers in the country. They're helping to keep us healthy, prevent disasters, and make green energy cheaper than coal. Lucky for us, our future is in their capable hands

Three of the Brilliant Ten:  John B. Carnett
We have a credo around here: The future will be better. It may sound optimistic in light of our wheezing environment and limping economy, but then you haven’t met the Brilliant 10, PopSci’s annual selection of the nation’s most promising young researchers.

They’re 10 powerful reasons to look on the bright side. Take materials scientist Ting Xu. She’s using nanotechnology to craft solar cells that are more energy-efficient and eco-friendly than oil or coal. John Rinn is unlocking the secrets of RNA to keep us healthier, a vital step toward solving our health-care woes. Jerome Lynch is making smart sensors for bridges that spot structural flaws before disaster strikes. And not one of these geniuses is over 40. The world is facing some pretty big problems, we admit, but with these talented minds tackling them, can you blame us for feeling hopeful?

Helping Hands: Dennis Hong created the humanoid CHARLI to better study our own biomechanics.  John B. Carnett

The Robot Maker

Brilliant because: He builds sophisticated robots that don’t just copy biology—they improve on its most elegant and efficient principles

Name: Dennis Hong
Age: 38
Affiliation: Virginia Tech

In 1977, a six-year-old boy visiting Los Angeles from South Korea saw Star Wars for the first time. He gaped at the curious locomotion of R2-D2 and the human-robot interactions of C-3PO, and as he flew back home, Dennis Hong remembers, “I knew I was going to build robots for the rest of my life.”

Hong was born in California, but when he was three, his father, an aerospace engineer, moved the family to Seoul for a job. Hong lived there until his sophomore year of college, when he transferred to the University of Wisconsin, and went on to grad school at Purdue University. “All of it was mechanical engineering, focused on robotics,” he says.

Today, Hong runs Virginia Tech’s Robotics and Mechanisms Laboratory, which has produced a robotic hand that’s dexterous enough to handle an egg, a pole-climbing snake ’bot for construction inspections, and a momentum-propelled, three-legged robot, among other projects.

“When I joined VT, people thought robotics should be all about intelligence,” Hong says. Instead, he chose to focus on mechanical systems found in nature. “We’re not copying nature; we’re using its principles,” he explains. The design of the three-legged robot, for instance, looks unnatural, yet it mimics the momentum of the human gait. To move forward, its hub flips over, causing one leg to swing between the other two. The robotic hand is controlled by compressed air, varying the strength of its grip without the use of other motors, in the same way human grip relies on elastic ligaments to help the fingers curl.

His lab’s latest effort is a humanoid called CHARLI, for Cognitive Humanoid Autonomous Robot with Learning Intelligence. It serves as a research platform for the study of human locomotion and a contender in Robocup 2010, a tournament in which robots compete in soccer matches.

Ultimately, Hong hopes to engineer robots that move with the grace and adaptability of humans. The key, he believes, is uninhibited research. In Korea, Hong recalls, “I grew up in an environment of people being afraid or ashamed to speak up. In my lab there’s no criticism, only refinement. You want to put a nuclear reactor in your robot? Fine, let’s pursue that.”

Leading by example, Hong has an organized way of putting his own least-inhibited ideas to use. “Next to my bed, I have a notebook and a pen,” he says. “Every night, I see lines, colorful things in my head. I wake up at 4 a.m., jot down everything. In the morning, I type it into my database of ideas. When funders want this or that, I look for a match.” —Jacob Ward

single page

28 Comments

I enjoyed the article, but was disappointed at first, because whomever posted (or wrote) it, did not bother to proof read it. The subject person featured, is introduced as "Michael Strand (also under the photo), but the whole article is about Michael Strano. I assume, for research purposes, the latter is accurate.

I know how!
When I was litle saw Star Wars too, but I was impress from the flying machines and now I'm able to make "Snow-Speeder" for example!!! And I have some ideas for new materials and way for fly including revolutionary engines...
Need only MONEY!!!

Lextir: These are called "typos" in the language of writers. "Typo" stands for typographical error. Errors are often defined as "common mistakes". Mistaking the name Strano for Strand by someone writing headings and captions, (as opposed to the individual who wrote the report and, hopefully, did research sufficient to get the subject's name right) is not impossible. They are similar, and Strand is somewhat more common that Strano. Nor does it require an arrogant and supercilious response. Somebody made a mistake. We humans, most of the rest of us being mere mortals, do that on occasion.

Lextir, Observer is right. It was probably a typo. An example of poor proofing was kindly provided by Observer when he said, "We humans, most of the rest of us being mere mortals, do that on occasion."
If proofed, that statement would have benefited from hyphens rather than the use of commas to express his thoughts.

Well, typos aside, I enjoyed it. As a university teacher of writing and myself a writer, I can observe that the choice in the instance cited between commas and hyphens is a toin coss, really; not all rules of punctuation and grammar were written on the backside of the 10 Commandments, after all! ;-) A little individual choice is stilly permissable, even in, say, the MLW Stylesheet and the Chicago Manual of Style.

While realizing these young people are genuinely exceptional, they do provide encouragement that not *all* of us are lazy sloths (as I tend to be, so I'm looking in the mirror!).

Part of the excitement about the areas in which these folks are working is that any of those areas could yield applicable results in the wider world at lightening speed. (Of course, it may turn out that none of them work out for years or decades to come, or maybe not at all.)

But consider something I read online just yesterday: about 10 of today's better work fields didn't EXIST -- just six years ago. (No, I didn't do the research to verify that.)

Then there's the exponential growth in knowledge; call it "Moore's Law Writ Large," if you will. A desktop computer I bought in 1997 had more processing power than the entire Mission Control in Houston had when we landed the first men on the Moon -- and that's from NASA, which happened to have an article using my exact computer as a comparison, not from the manufacturer. And that's stunning.

Further, the people who are the subjects of this article will undoubtedly inspire even younger young, bright sparks who will light their own torches.

Sigh. Who am I to talk? MLA Stylesheet, not MLW!!!

I wish these fascinating articles would have more detail such as components of the robot and what the robot in the picture can actually do.

Me too. Unfortunately this site is more about making money, and itwould cost more to hire competent writers that are willing to flesh out a story with facts, pictures (useful ones not taken by Vinny), and explanations. Yes it is harder than regurgitating facts, but it is what people come here to read.

Well if you're not happy you can always see somewhere else, and create a website with "really good" informations. Or maybe you can see this website just as an introduction that should encourage you to look further in details in what interests you.

Daniel.
www.scrabblecheat.org

I'm glad to see the 'typo' on Strano's name has been corrected!

Thing is, I don't think it's just a 'typo' if you get someones name wrong. Especially if the article is about people. Detracts slightly from the fact that you are introducing people to us if you get their name wrong.

All water under the bridge now though, I guess.

Strano's work though sounds superb.

www.faqmyjob.co.uk | www.proviser.com | www.faqmyjob.com | www.conakat.com

Excellent read, I just passed this onto a colleague who was doing a little research on that. And he actually bought me lunch because I found it for him smile So let me rephrase that: Thanks for lunch!
tax accounting|Weight Loss Women

I am afraid that robots may rule humans as in the film Transformer ! :) Much happy to know. All the best to these three brilliant stars !
Regards
Articles

Looks like we have some really brilliant people. This is a very informative article i'll follow up their work closely. These will be the people who will shape our future.
| Written by Dimitri from Eat Healthier Foods |

Very interesting! And really there are a lot of such people who thunk that they are not scientists and are not able to make some discoveries. But is fact they could be important people for the human's life!

No offense to the females, but am I the only one who are surprised to see this many women among those 10?
Considering how many women work in this industri compared to men it's really well done. My favorite would have to be John Rinn though, I really hope he managed to solve some of the stuff with DNA degeneration over time.

Regards,
C.Potty

thats the amazing bridge.especially bridge with sensors usually only track seismic activity, thats expensive as far as i know.Honda Generator | Onan Generator | Coleman Powermate Generator

Very interesting! And really there are a lot of such people who thunk that they are not scientists and are not able to make some discoveries. But is fact they could be important people for the human's life..

Evail
http://burnwiigames.org

I love to see the next generation of inventors and scientists showing off their stuff. It gives me hope and the realization that we are still just scratching the surface of human ingenuity! :)

Mike
www.etermlifeinsurance.net

Thing is, I don't think it's just a 'typo' if you get someones name wrong. Especially if the article is about people. Detracts slightly from the fact that you are introducing people to us if you get their name wrong.
http://www.egovernmentjobs.in/category/government-jobs-iii/

It would be great to finally develop software to avoid other types of tragedies. Good luck for the future. www.mts-bw.de + www.edvlab.de

Excellent read, thanks.
www.parienligne.fr

I wonder these people will change the way we think, work and eat. I guess there would be a time when you can order anything, a robot will follow you. if you have anybody organ malfunctioning, then no worries, just have bucks. They will solve any problem. I guess where are we heading.....
www.promdresspicture.com

لقد استمتعت المقالة ، لكن خاب في البداية ، لأن أيا النشر (أو كتب) أنه لم يكلف نفسه عناء إثبات قراءتها. هو عرض الشخص الموضوع المميز ، كما مايكل ستراند "(أيضا في إطار الصورة) ، إلا أن هذه المادة كلها حول سترانو مايكل. أفترض ، لأغراض البحث ، وهذا الأخير دقيقة.
http://www.autonewstoday.net

Excellent read, I just passed this onto a colleague who was doing a little research on that. And he actually bought me lunch because I found it for him smile So let me rephrase that: Thanks for lunch!
tax accounting|Weight Loss Women
www.tran33m.com/vb/

Lextir: Dessa kallas "stavfel" på det språk som författare. "Stavfel" står för skrivfel. Fel definieras ofta som "vanliga misstag". Miste på namnet Strano för Strand av någon att skriva rubriker och bildtexter, (i motsats till den person som skrev rapporten och, förhoppningsvis, gjorde efterforskningar tillräckligt för att få en persons namn till höger) är inte omöjligt. De är liknande, och Strand är något vanligare att Strano. Inte heller behöver det en arrogant och överlägset svar. Någon gjorde ett misstag. Vi människor, de flesta av oss andra är vanliga dödliga, göra det ibland.

www.car-area.com
www.carnews.biz
www.carsite.biz
www.thaicarnews.com

Molto interessante! E in realtà ci sono un sacco di queste persone che thunk che non sono scienziati e non sono in grado di fare alcune scoperte. Ma è un fatto che potrebbero essere persone importanti per la vita dell'essere umano!
www.top-wedding-dresses.net
www.wedding-todays.com
www.wedding18idea.com
www.thaicarnews.com

Mi piace vedere la prossima generazione di inventori e scienziati in mostra la loro roba. E mi dà speranza e la consapevolezza che siamo ancora solo l'inizio di ingegno umano!

www.wedding4teen.com
www.weddingexe.com
www.wedding4what.com
www.thaicarnews.com


140 years of Popular Science at your fingertips.



Popular Science+ For iPad

Each issue has been completely reimagined for your iPad. See our amazing new vision for magazines that goes far beyond the printed page



Download Our App

Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone or Android phone with full articles, images and offline viewing



Follow Us On Twitter

Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed


April 2013: How It Works

For our annual How It Works issue, we break down everything from the massive Falcon Heavy rocket to a tiny DNA sequencer that connects to a USB port. We also take a look at an ambitious plan for faster-than-light travel and dive into the billion-dollar science of dog food.

Plus the latest Legos, Cadillac's plug-in hybrid, a tractor built for the apocalypse, and more.


Online Content Director: Suzanne LaBarre | Email
Senior Editor: Paul Adams | Email
Associate Editor: Dan Nosowitz | Email
Assistant Editor: Colin Lecher | Email
Assistant Editor:Rose Pastore | Email

Contributing Writers:
Rebecca Boyle | Email
Kelsey D. Atherton | Email
Francie Diep | Email
Shaunacy Ferro | Email

circ-top-header.gif
circ-cover.gif