In London, Ontario, a team from the University of Western Ontario is bringing a fairy tale to life at the Insurance Research Lab for Better Homes. They don't have a wolf, but in their "Three Little Pigs" project they are literally trying to blow the roof off, subjecting full-scale houses to pressures that simulate wind forces matching those of a Category 5 hurricane: 200 mph. Researchers are looking to find the sources of structural weakness in house construction in order to improve building design in the future.
The controlled environment in which this windy city comes to life has a hefty price tag -- $7 million -- and is the first of its kind. The abused model home is not made of straw or sticks or brick, but is a two-story, four-bedroom home measuring 1,900 square feet, typical of houses in the region. For mobility, it is enclosed in a hangar that can run on tracks. During tests, the surrounding framework is rigged up with 60 "pressure boxes" that bring on the pressure, through large hoses that are able to suck and blow in a manner that mimics a wind force. Such realistic testing has never before been performed on a full-scale home. According to researcher Greg Kopp, the force created is like "turning the house upside down, adding weight to it, and shaking it!"
In their artificial hurricane zone, researchers are pinpointing how the weight of the house redistributes itself once the roof is damaged, and using that information to determine if building codes are up to snuff (or huff and puff, as it were). Eventually, their goal is to test different building products and wind damage mitigation strategies under the same conditions.
It's not only wind that can ruin a home, so the team is concurrently observing damage caused by water and mold, of the sort—recently seen on a large scale after Hurricane Katrina.
With many homeowners feeling the economic pinch these days, researchers are not looking to redesign entire houses. Instead, they want to identify basic additions and amendments that could be made to pre-existing houses to make them stronger and safer, without burning a hole in people's wallets -- a concern the wicked wolf never had.
138 years of Popular Science at your fingertips.
Each issue has been completely reimagined for your iPad. See our amazing new vision for magazines that goes far beyond the printed page
Stay up to date on the latest news of the future of science and technology from your iPhone or Android phone with full articles, images and offline viewing
Featuring every article from the magazine and website, plus links from around the Web. Also see our PopSci DIY feed
Science is reinventing play, from extreme sports to gamification to ridiculous roller coasters to the playgrounds of tomorrow, and this issue is chock full of fun. Also, on a less fun note: Did global warming destroy my hometown?
I must say that will be $7,000,000 well spent if it actually helps people's homes survive, not to mention the people in them... Katrina alone cost $1,100,000,000.00
from Plymouth, WI
Anyone remember the article in PopSci a couple years ago, about the hurricane-proof nail? I'll bet that could have the same benefit in protecting against tornado damage. I commend the efforts of this study, but it seems like a large price tag for information that may or may not lead to new discoveries...
Prevention being the best cure, this is a great study, though I have to agree that the price tag is quite high... I'm certain they didn't shop around for materials and contractors. But anyway, if the tests even end up coming up with peripherally useful data, the cost is justified in the long run.
Who knows... Maybe it'll force us to come up with services aside from mold removal!
---
www.southjerseymoldtesting.com